FDA and state rules, for what you actually buy.
Search a drug, ingredient or device for its live FDA record, or pick your state and a category to see the federal rules and what your state adds — each answer with its citation and source.


GLP-1 & metabolic injectables
FDA pathway: Drug (NDA) | Compounded 503A/503B
Approved semaglutide, tirzepatide and orforglipron products are Rx drugs; the shortages are resolved, FDA's compounding wind-downs ended in 2025, the Fifth Circuit upheld FDA in Aug 2026, and FDA has proposed barring 503B bulk compounding of these molecules.
On MedGrid as: GLP-1 & Metabolic Injectables · GLP-1 Therapeutics
The federal rules
Shortages resolved; compounding wind-down dates passedTirzepatide's shortage was resolved Oct 2, 2024 (reaffirmed Dec 19, 2024) and semaglutide's on Feb 21, 2025; FDA's enforcement-discretion periods ended in 2025.
FDA's GLP-1 page (content current 04/01/2026) says: tirzepatide 503A discretion has ended and 503B ended March 19, 2025; semaglutide 503A ended April 22, 2025 and 503B ended May 22, 2025. After that, compounding 'essentially copies' of these approved drugs is not protected by shortage status; a 503A prescriber must document a patient-specific significant difference for a non-copy.
Courts upheld FDA's delisting (OFA v. FDA)District courts denied injunctions (Mar 5, 2025 tirzepatide; Apr 24, 2025 semaglutide) and the Fifth Circuit affirmed in both cases on Aug 27, 2026.
In No. 25-10600 (tirzepatide) the Fifth Circuit assumed, without deciding, that FDA erred by not using notice-and-comment procedures, held that the compounders had not shown prejudice from it, and held the shortage determination was not arbitrary or capricious. In No. 25-10758 (semaglutide; opinion revised Sept 1, 2026) it affirmed for the same reasons: any notice-and-comment error was harmless. Both are unpublished per curiam opinions.
- Outsourcing Facilities Ass'n v. FDA, No. 25-10600 (5th Cir. Aug. 27, 2026) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2026-08-27
- Outsourcing Facilities Ass'n v. FDA, No. 25-10758 (5th Cir. Aug. 27, 2026, revised Sept. 1, 2026) — U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2026-09-01
- FDA clarifies policies for compounders as national GLP-1 supply begins to stabilize — FDA, 2026-04-01
503B bulk exclusion proposed (April 2026)FDA proposed on Apr 30, 2026 to exclude semaglutide, tirzepatide and liraglutide from the 503B bulks list, finding no clinical need for outsourcing facilities to compound them from bulk.
FDA's Federal Register notice (91 FR 23431, May 1, 2026) proposes not to include the three substances on the 503B Bulks List; the comment period was extended to July 30, 2026 (91 FR 38719). FDA's release quoted the Commissioner: 'When FDA-approved drugs are available, outsourcing facilities cannot lawfully compound using bulk drug substances unless there is a clear clinical need.' No final decision had been published as of 2026-09-23.
- FDA Proposes to Exclude Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, and Liraglutide on 503B Bulks List — FDA, 2026-04-30
- List of Bulk Drug Substances for Which There Is a Clinical Need Under Section 503B (proposal not to include semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide), 91 FR 23431 — FDA, Federal Register, 2026-05-01
- List of Bulk Drug Substances ... Under Section 503B; Extension of Comment Period (comments due July 30, 2026), 91 FR 38719 — FDA, Federal Register, 2026-06-26
Safety: salt forms, dosing errors, adverse eventsFDA has 990 adverse event reports for compounded semaglutide and more than 730 for compounded tirzepatide (as of May 31, 2026), and says semaglutide sodium/acetate salts are different active ingredients from the approved drugs.
FDA also reports hospitalizations linked to dosing errors with compounded injectable semaglutide, counterfeit Ozempic in the supply chain, and products falsely labeled 'for research purposes'.
- FDA's Concerns with Unapproved GLP-1 Drugs Used for Weight Loss — FDA, 2026-09-01
Marketing: no 'same as Wegovy/Zepbound' or 'FDA-approved' claimsFDA warning letters to telehealth firms cite claims that compounded GLP-1s are the same as, generic versions of, or as proven as approved drugs, or that they come from 'FDA-approved' pharmacies.
FDA's telehealth guidance page (content current 06/15/2026) lists prohibited practices, including branding that suggests the telehealth firm is the compounder. Example: June 8, 2026 warning letter to Medica Weight Loss stated 'Compounded drug products are not FDA-approved' and that calling a pharmacy 'FDA-approved' is false and misleading.
- FDA to Telehealth Companies: What to Know When Promoting Compounded Drugs — FDA, 2026-06-15
- Warning Letter: Medica Weight Loss (MARCS-CMS 728284) — FDA, 2026-06-08
GLP-1 API imports: Import Alert 66-80 'Green List'Since September 2025, GLP-1 APIs from manufacturers not on FDA's Green List are detained at the border.
Covers semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide, exenatide, orforglipron, retatrutide and dulaglutide APIs. FDA found 21% of inspected GLP-1 API makers noncompliant with CGMP and cited firms that register, refuse records requests, then deregister.
- Import Alert 66-80 — FDA, 2026-09-21
Changing now
- New oral options: Wegovy tablets (NDA 218316, approved Dec 22, 2025) and Foundayo (orforglipron, NDA 220934, approved Apr 1, 2026); a semaglutide ANDA received tentative approval Apr 7, 2026. — openFDA Drugs@FDA query (semaglutide, orforglipron)
- Final FDA action on excluding semaglutide, tirzepatide and liraglutide from the 503B bulks list (comments closed July 30, 2026). — List of Bulk Drug Substances ... Under Section 503B; Extension of Comment Period (comments due July 30, 2026), 91 FR 38719
- Retatrutide is not FDA-approved; FDA includes it in Import Alert 66-80 and RUO warning letters. — Import Alert 66-80
What Florida adds
Out-of-state pharmacies shipping into the stateOut-of-state pharmacies must register with the Florida Board of Pharmacy as nonresident pharmacies to ship dispensed drugs into Florida, and need a separate nonresident sterile compounding permit for sterile compounded products.License required
Must a pharmacy located in another state hold a license/registration from this state to ship prescriptions (including patient-specific 503A compounded preparations) to patients or practitioners here?
Fla. Stat. §465.0156 treats any out-of-state pharmacy that ships, mails or delivers a dispensed medicinal drug into Florida as a nonresident pharmacy that must register with the Board (biennial renewal). It must disclose its home-state license, officers and prescription department manager, keep Florida records readily retrievable, and provide a toll-free line (at least 6 days and 40 hours a week). The pharmacy and its prescription department manager must be licensed in the state where the pharmacy is located; the statute does not require a Florida-licensed manager. §465.0158 separately requires a nonresident sterile compounding permit to ship compounded sterile products into Florida. That permit requires an owner/PIC attestation, USP <797> policies, and a home-state inspection report no older than 6 months (initial) or 1 year (renewal); otherwise the Department inspects at the applicant's cost or accepts an approved entity's or an FDA inspection report.
The Board may exempt isolated transactions (§465.0156(2)). Internet pharmacies permitted under §465.0197 are handled separately. Last statutory amendment to §465.0156 was in 2022 (ch. 2022-35).
Fla. Stat. §465.0156; §465.0158
- Fla. Stat. §465.0156 — Registration of nonresident pharmacies (2026 Florida Statutes) — The Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
- Fla. Stat. §465.0158 — Nonresident sterile compounding permit (2026 Florida Statutes) — The Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
Office-use compounding from 503A pharmaciesFlorida's compounding rule (amended Aug. 3, 2026) sets out office-use supply only for veterinarians and requires human office-use or office-stock compounding to strictly follow federal law (21 U.S.C. 353a/353b), which FDA reads as allowing office stock only from 503B outsourcing facilities.Not allowed
May a 503A (traditional) pharmacy dispense or distribute compounded preparations to a practitioner for office use (administration in the office, not patient-specific)? The federal position is that 503A requires patient-specific prescriptions; this is what the state pharmacy act and board rules allow.
Fla. Admin. Code R. 64B16-27.700(3) lets a pharmacist dispense compounded drugs to a veterinarian for office use, subject to quantity limits, a written agreement, records retrievable within 72 hours, and a 'Compounded Drug' label. For human-use products, subsection (4) states that compounding practices 'such as patient-specific, anticipatory, office stock or office use' must strictly adhere to federal law, including 21 U.S.C. 353a and 353b. The rule gives no separate state authorization for 503A office stock for human patients. Under FDA's interpretation, 503A compounding requires a patient-specific prescription, so non-patient-specific office stock comes through 503B outsourcing facilities. The Florida Board of Pharmacy (Department of Health) enforces the rule.
The rule was amended three times between 2025 and 2026 (effective 4-9-25, 3-10-26 and 8-3-26). The Board's notices describe the 2025-2026 changes as removing 'unnecessary' or 'outdated' language. The 'no' answer reflects the rule's deference to federal law as FDA reads it; the rule itself does not use the word 'prohibited'. Florida sources that predate 2025 may describe different office-use terms.
Fla. Admin. Code R. 64B16-27.700(3)-(4) (amended 4-9-25, 3-10-26, 8-3-26)
- Rule 64B16-27.700 Compounding (current text, effective 8/3/2026) — Florida Department of State — Florida Administrative Code, 2026-08-03
503B outsourcing facilities shipping into the stateAn out-of-state 503B must hold a Florida nonresident sterile compounding permit to ship compounded sterile products (e.g., injectables) into Florida; Florida's drug-manufacturer permits may also apply.Depends
Does the state require an FDA-registered 503B outsourcing facility located outside the state to hold a state license/registration (as an outsourcing facility, nonresident manufacturer, wholesaler or pharmacy) before shipping into the state?
Fla. Stat. §465.0158(1) requires a nonresident sterile compounding permit before 'an outsourcing facility' may ship, mail, deliver or dispense compounded sterile products into Florida. §465.003 defines an outsourcing facility as an FDA-registered 503B location where sterile compounding occurs. A 503B that is not a pharmacy submits proof of FDA outsourcing registration and its home-state license or permit in place of nonresident pharmacy registration. It also submits cGMP-compliant policies and a current inspection report (6 months old for initial, 1 year for renewal; FDA inspection reports may be accepted). The statute does not address non-sterile products from 503Bs. Separately, §499.01(2)(c) requires a nonresident prescription drug manufacturer permit (DBPR) for out-of-state manufacturers distributing prescription drugs in Florida. Ch. 499 defines 'manufacture' to include compounding and excludes only pharmacies.
Whether DBPR (Division of Drugs, Devices and Cosmetics) requires a ch. 499 nonresident manufacturer permit of 503B outsourcing facilities was not confirmed. §465.0158 history: ch. 2014-148, ch. 2016-224.
Fla. Stat. §465.0158; §465.003 (definition of outsourcing facility); §499.01(2)(c); §499.003
- Fla. Stat. §465.0158 — Nonresident sterile compounding permit (2026 Florida Statutes) — The Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
- Fla. Stat. §499.01 — Permits (2026 Florida Statutes) — The Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
FDA compounding MOUFlorida has not signed FDA's standard compounding MOU, so under the statute its 503A pharmacies are limited to 5% out-of-state distribution, although FDA is not enforcing that limit while it rewrites the MOU.Not signed
Has the state signed FDA's standard Memorandum of Understanding Addressing Certain Distributions of Compounded Human Drug Products (October 2020)? If not, FD&C Act §503A limits its 503A pharmacies' out-of-state distribution to 5% of total prescription orders (currently not enforced by FDA pending rulemaking).
Signing the standard MOU means the state board agrees to investigate complaints about compounded drugs its 503A pharmacies ship out of state and to identify and report to FDA pharmacies that distribute "inordinate amounts" interstate (more than 50% of their compounded prescriptions); in exchange, the statutory 5% out-of-state cap in FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B) does not apply to that state's pharmacies. FDA lists only Colorado, Kentucky and New Hampshire as signatories; Florida is not among them. For a non-signing state, FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B)(ii) caps a 503A pharmacy's out-of-state distribution of compounded drugs at 5% of its total prescription orders. FDA now considers the October 2020 standard MOU suspended (it does not expect signatory states to carry out MOU activities and will not sign new ones) and is not enforcing the 5% limit until a final rule and an updated MOU are published; FDA's rulemaking (RIN 0910-AI71) listed a proposed rule for 11/2026 in the Fall 2025 Unified Agenda.
The FDA list of signed MOUs (current as of 2023-01-23) is older than 2 years, but FDA stopped entering new agreements under the 2020 MOU in October 2022, so no state can have signed since. The FDA "Compounding Information for States" page (current as of 2026-08-28) still describes the MOU as awaiting rulemaking. Pending: FDA proposed rule on 503A distribution (RIN 0910-AI71, NPRM projected 11/2026); H.R. 5316 (introduced 2025-09-11, referred to House Energy & Commerce) would remove the MOU provision from §503A.
FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B) (21 U.S.C. 353a(b)(3)(B))
- Compounding MOUs (list of signed standard MOUs) — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2023-01-23
- Memorandum of Understanding Addressing Certain Distributions of Compounded Drugs — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2022-10-20
- Compounding Information for States — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2026-08-28
- Federal Register 87 FR 63770 (Oct. 21, 2022), Doc. 2022-22876 — MOU suspension and extension of 5% enforcement period — Federal Register / GovInfo, 2022-10-21
Physicians dispensing from the officeFlorida practitioners must register as dispensing practitioners to dispense for a fee, and registered dispensers may not dispense Schedule II or III drugs such as testosterone, with narrow exceptions.Allowed with permit or limits
May physicians dispense prescription drugs (not just administer them) directly to patients from their practice? "Yes" means allowed under standard rules (labeling, records, and at most a simple notice to the board); "conditional" means a separate dispensing registration, permit or license, or quantity, day-supply or drug-category limits; "no" means prohibited except narrow exceptions.
Fla. Stat. 465.0276 requires a practitioner who dispenses medicinal drugs for a fee to register with the professional licensing board as a dispensing practitioner (fee up to $100). A registered practitioner may not dispense Schedule II or Schedule III controlled substances, except free samples, dispensing in connection with surgery (Schedule III up to 14 days), approved clinical trials, Department of Corrections, and FDA-approved opioid-addiction treatment. Before dispensing, the practitioner must give a written prescription and advise the patient it may be filled in the office or at any pharmacy, and must label non-manufacturer packages. Complimentary samples dispensed without remuneration need no registration.
Read from the 2025 Florida Statutes edition on flsenate.gov (last amended by ch. 2018-13). Practical effect: testosterone (C-III) generally cannot be dispensed from a Florida office; it can be administered in office or prescribed to a pharmacy.
Fla. Stat. 465.0276
- Florida Statutes 465.0276 - Dispensing practitioner (2025) — The Florida Senate, 2026-09-23
Prescribing by telehealthFlorida lets clinicians licensed elsewhere register as out-of-state telehealth providers, requires no prior physical exam, and restricts telehealth prescribing only for Schedule II drugs.Allowed with extra conditions
For a patient located in the state: must the prescriber hold this state's license (or a telehealth registration or special license), is an in-person exam required before prescribing (generally or for controlled substances), are there state limits on prescribing Schedule III drugs such as testosterone by telehealth, and is the state an Interstate Medical Licensure Compact member? "Yes" means a state license and the in-person standard of care apply (opioid-only or Schedule II-only limits are described but do not change the answer); "conditional" means extra state conditions such as a telehealth registration route, an in-person exam requirement, controlled-substance limits reaching Schedule III, or registration of telehealth businesses. Federal DEA rules apply on top.
A clinician not licensed in Florida may treat Florida patients by telehealth after registering with the applicable board as a telehealth provider; registrants need liability coverage and may not open a Florida office or provide in-person care (Fla. Stat. 456.47). If the evaluation is sufficient to diagnose and treat, no prior physical exam or record review is required. Telehealth providers may not prescribe Schedule II controlled substances except for psychiatric disorders, inpatient hospital care, hospice or nursing-home residents; the statute places no telehealth-specific limit on Schedule III drugs such as testosterone. IMLC: member.
Read from the 2025 Florida Statutes edition (created 2019, amended 2020, 2022, 2023). Florida joined the IMLC through CS/SB 7016 (IMLC map dated 12/20/2024).
Fla. Stat. 456.47
- Florida Statutes 456.47 - Use of telehealth to provide services (2025) — The Florida Senate, 2026-09-23
- Florida - Professional Requirements — Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP), 2026-06-19
- IMLC Commission - Compact State Map (participating states) — Interstate Medical Licensure Compact Commission, 2026-09-23
Compare every state: Out-of-state pharmacies shipping into the state · Office-use compounding from 503A pharmacies · 503B outsourcing facilities shipping into the state · FDA compounding MOU · Physicians dispensing from the office · Prescribing by telehealth
Florida at a glance
Every topic we research, for Florida. Open any line for the rule, its citation and the source.
Pharmacy & compounding
Out-of-state pharmacies shipping into the stateOut-of-state pharmacies must register with the Florida Board of Pharmacy as nonresident pharmacies to ship dispensed drugs into Florida, and need a separate nonresident sterile compounding permit for sterile compounded products.License required
Must a pharmacy located in another state hold a license/registration from this state to ship prescriptions (including patient-specific 503A compounded preparations) to patients or practitioners here?
Fla. Stat. §465.0156 treats any out-of-state pharmacy that ships, mails or delivers a dispensed medicinal drug into Florida as a nonresident pharmacy that must register with the Board (biennial renewal). It must disclose its home-state license, officers and prescription department manager, keep Florida records readily retrievable, and provide a toll-free line (at least 6 days and 40 hours a week). The pharmacy and its prescription department manager must be licensed in the state where the pharmacy is located; the statute does not require a Florida-licensed manager. §465.0158 separately requires a nonresident sterile compounding permit to ship compounded sterile products into Florida. That permit requires an owner/PIC attestation, USP <797> policies, and a home-state inspection report no older than 6 months (initial) or 1 year (renewal); otherwise the Department inspects at the applicant's cost or accepts an approved entity's or an FDA inspection report.
The Board may exempt isolated transactions (§465.0156(2)). Internet pharmacies permitted under §465.0197 are handled separately. Last statutory amendment to §465.0156 was in 2022 (ch. 2022-35).
Fla. Stat. §465.0156; §465.0158
- Fla. Stat. §465.0156 — Registration of nonresident pharmacies (2026 Florida Statutes) — The Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
- Fla. Stat. §465.0158 — Nonresident sterile compounding permit (2026 Florida Statutes) — The Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
Office-use compounding from 503A pharmaciesFlorida's compounding rule (amended Aug. 3, 2026) sets out office-use supply only for veterinarians and requires human office-use or office-stock compounding to strictly follow federal law (21 U.S.C. 353a/353b), which FDA reads as allowing office stock only from 503B outsourcing facilities.Not allowed
May a 503A (traditional) pharmacy dispense or distribute compounded preparations to a practitioner for office use (administration in the office, not patient-specific)? The federal position is that 503A requires patient-specific prescriptions; this is what the state pharmacy act and board rules allow.
Fla. Admin. Code R. 64B16-27.700(3) lets a pharmacist dispense compounded drugs to a veterinarian for office use, subject to quantity limits, a written agreement, records retrievable within 72 hours, and a 'Compounded Drug' label. For human-use products, subsection (4) states that compounding practices 'such as patient-specific, anticipatory, office stock or office use' must strictly adhere to federal law, including 21 U.S.C. 353a and 353b. The rule gives no separate state authorization for 503A office stock for human patients. Under FDA's interpretation, 503A compounding requires a patient-specific prescription, so non-patient-specific office stock comes through 503B outsourcing facilities. The Florida Board of Pharmacy (Department of Health) enforces the rule.
The rule was amended three times between 2025 and 2026 (effective 4-9-25, 3-10-26 and 8-3-26). The Board's notices describe the 2025-2026 changes as removing 'unnecessary' or 'outdated' language. The 'no' answer reflects the rule's deference to federal law as FDA reads it; the rule itself does not use the word 'prohibited'. Florida sources that predate 2025 may describe different office-use terms.
Fla. Admin. Code R. 64B16-27.700(3)-(4) (amended 4-9-25, 3-10-26, 8-3-26)
- Rule 64B16-27.700 Compounding (current text, effective 8/3/2026) — Florida Department of State — Florida Administrative Code, 2026-08-03
503B outsourcing facilities shipping into the stateAn out-of-state 503B must hold a Florida nonresident sterile compounding permit to ship compounded sterile products (e.g., injectables) into Florida; Florida's drug-manufacturer permits may also apply.Depends
Does the state require an FDA-registered 503B outsourcing facility located outside the state to hold a state license/registration (as an outsourcing facility, nonresident manufacturer, wholesaler or pharmacy) before shipping into the state?
Fla. Stat. §465.0158(1) requires a nonresident sterile compounding permit before 'an outsourcing facility' may ship, mail, deliver or dispense compounded sterile products into Florida. §465.003 defines an outsourcing facility as an FDA-registered 503B location where sterile compounding occurs. A 503B that is not a pharmacy submits proof of FDA outsourcing registration and its home-state license or permit in place of nonresident pharmacy registration. It also submits cGMP-compliant policies and a current inspection report (6 months old for initial, 1 year for renewal; FDA inspection reports may be accepted). The statute does not address non-sterile products from 503Bs. Separately, §499.01(2)(c) requires a nonresident prescription drug manufacturer permit (DBPR) for out-of-state manufacturers distributing prescription drugs in Florida. Ch. 499 defines 'manufacture' to include compounding and excludes only pharmacies.
Whether DBPR (Division of Drugs, Devices and Cosmetics) requires a ch. 499 nonresident manufacturer permit of 503B outsourcing facilities was not confirmed. §465.0158 history: ch. 2014-148, ch. 2016-224.
Fla. Stat. §465.0158; §465.003 (definition of outsourcing facility); §499.01(2)(c); §499.003
- Fla. Stat. §465.0158 — Nonresident sterile compounding permit (2026 Florida Statutes) — The Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
- Fla. Stat. §499.01 — Permits (2026 Florida Statutes) — The Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
FDA compounding MOUFlorida has not signed FDA's standard compounding MOU, so under the statute its 503A pharmacies are limited to 5% out-of-state distribution, although FDA is not enforcing that limit while it rewrites the MOU.Not signed
Has the state signed FDA's standard Memorandum of Understanding Addressing Certain Distributions of Compounded Human Drug Products (October 2020)? If not, FD&C Act §503A limits its 503A pharmacies' out-of-state distribution to 5% of total prescription orders (currently not enforced by FDA pending rulemaking).
Signing the standard MOU means the state board agrees to investigate complaints about compounded drugs its 503A pharmacies ship out of state and to identify and report to FDA pharmacies that distribute "inordinate amounts" interstate (more than 50% of their compounded prescriptions); in exchange, the statutory 5% out-of-state cap in FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B) does not apply to that state's pharmacies. FDA lists only Colorado, Kentucky and New Hampshire as signatories; Florida is not among them. For a non-signing state, FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B)(ii) caps a 503A pharmacy's out-of-state distribution of compounded drugs at 5% of its total prescription orders. FDA now considers the October 2020 standard MOU suspended (it does not expect signatory states to carry out MOU activities and will not sign new ones) and is not enforcing the 5% limit until a final rule and an updated MOU are published; FDA's rulemaking (RIN 0910-AI71) listed a proposed rule for 11/2026 in the Fall 2025 Unified Agenda.
The FDA list of signed MOUs (current as of 2023-01-23) is older than 2 years, but FDA stopped entering new agreements under the 2020 MOU in October 2022, so no state can have signed since. The FDA "Compounding Information for States" page (current as of 2026-08-28) still describes the MOU as awaiting rulemaking. Pending: FDA proposed rule on 503A distribution (RIN 0910-AI71, NPRM projected 11/2026); H.R. 5316 (introduced 2025-09-11, referred to House Energy & Commerce) would remove the MOU provision from §503A.
FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B) (21 U.S.C. 353a(b)(3)(B))
- Compounding MOUs (list of signed standard MOUs) — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2023-01-23
- Memorandum of Understanding Addressing Certain Distributions of Compounded Drugs — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2022-10-20
- Compounding Information for States — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2026-08-28
- Federal Register 87 FR 63770 (Oct. 21, 2022), Doc. 2022-22876 — MOU suspension and extension of 5% enforcement period — Federal Register / GovInfo, 2022-10-21
Prescribing, dispensing & telehealth
State controlled-substance registrationFlorida has no separate state controlled substance registration: a 'practitioner' under Chapter 893 is a Florida licensee who holds a valid DEA registration, but Florida bars dispensing practitioners from dispensing Schedule II and III drugs (including testosterone) outside narrow exceptions.DEA + state license only
Besides DEA registration, does the state require practitioners to hold a separate state controlled substance registration, license or permit to prescribe, administer or dispense controlled substances (e.g. testosterone, Schedule III)? "Conditional" means a state registration is needed only in some settings, such as keeping controlled-substance stock in the office.
Fla. Stat. 893.02 defines 'practitioner' as a physician, osteopathic physician, APRN, PA and other listed licensees 'provided such practitioner holds a valid federal controlled substance registry number' - no state CS registration is required. A practitioner who dispenses drugs for a fee must register with their board as a dispensing practitioner (fee up to $100, renewed with the license) and follow pharmacy rules (Fla. Stat. 465.0276(2)). A registered dispensing practitioner may not dispense a Schedule II or Schedule III controlled substance except samples, surgical procedures (Schedule III up to a 14-day supply), approved clinical trials, opioid-treatment programs and a few other listed settings (465.0276(1)(b)); in-office administration is not dispensing.
Key for testosterone (Schedule III): a Florida office cannot dispense take-home testosterone under the dispensing-practitioner registration except under the listed exceptions; prescribing and in-office administration are unaffected. Florida also requires E-FORCSE (PDMP) use; pain-management clinics register separately (not researched here).
Fla. Stat. 893.02; Fla. Stat. 465.0276
- Florida Statutes 893.02 Definitions (2026) — The Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
- Florida Statutes 465.0276 Dispensing practitioner (2026) — The Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
PDMP check before prescribingFlorida requires prescribers and dispensers to check E-FORCSE before every prescription or dispensing of a Schedule II-V controlled substance (including testosterone) for patients 16 and older.Check required (covers C-III)
Must a prescriber query the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program before prescribing, and does the mandate cover Schedule III drugs such as testosterone? "Yes" means a mandate that reaches Schedule III; "conditional" means a mandate limited to certain drugs (e.g. opioids or benzodiazepines) or situations; "no" means no prescriber query mandate.
Fla. Stat. 893.055(8) requires a prescriber or dispenser (or designee) to consult the PDMP before prescribing or dispensing a controlled substance for a patient age 16 or older; 'controlled substance' means Schedules II-V and 'dispenser' includes a dispensing health care practitioner. Exceptions: nonopioid Schedule V drugs, hospice patients, and system outages (in which case the reason must be documented and no more than a 3-day supply may be prescribed or dispensed). The duty is triggered by prescribing or dispensing; in-office 'administration' is defined separately and is not listed as a trigger. The Department of Health issues a nondisciplinary citation for a first offense; later offenses are subject to discipline.
Frequency: every prescription/dispensing (no periodic interval). Testosterone (C-III) is caught for both prescribing and physician dispensing. Section history includes a 2026 amendment (s. 167, ch. 2026-168); the mandate text read is from the 2026 Florida Statutes. PDMP TTAC also lists board rules 64B8-9.0181 and 64B15-14.0131 (not reviewed).
Fla. Stat. § 893.055(1), (8)
- The 2026 Florida Statutes, 893.055 Prescription drug monitoring program — Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
Physicians dispensing from the officeFlorida practitioners must register as dispensing practitioners to dispense for a fee, and registered dispensers may not dispense Schedule II or III drugs such as testosterone, with narrow exceptions.Allowed with permit or limits
May physicians dispense prescription drugs (not just administer them) directly to patients from their practice? "Yes" means allowed under standard rules (labeling, records, and at most a simple notice to the board); "conditional" means a separate dispensing registration, permit or license, or quantity, day-supply or drug-category limits; "no" means prohibited except narrow exceptions.
Fla. Stat. 465.0276 requires a practitioner who dispenses medicinal drugs for a fee to register with the professional licensing board as a dispensing practitioner (fee up to $100). A registered practitioner may not dispense Schedule II or Schedule III controlled substances, except free samples, dispensing in connection with surgery (Schedule III up to 14 days), approved clinical trials, Department of Corrections, and FDA-approved opioid-addiction treatment. Before dispensing, the practitioner must give a written prescription and advise the patient it may be filled in the office or at any pharmacy, and must label non-manufacturer packages. Complimentary samples dispensed without remuneration need no registration.
Read from the 2025 Florida Statutes edition on flsenate.gov (last amended by ch. 2018-13). Practical effect: testosterone (C-III) generally cannot be dispensed from a Florida office; it can be administered in office or prescribed to a pharmacy.
Fla. Stat. 465.0276
- Florida Statutes 465.0276 - Dispensing practitioner (2025) — The Florida Senate, 2026-09-23
Prescribing by telehealthFlorida lets clinicians licensed elsewhere register as out-of-state telehealth providers, requires no prior physical exam, and restricts telehealth prescribing only for Schedule II drugs.Allowed with extra conditions
For a patient located in the state: must the prescriber hold this state's license (or a telehealth registration or special license), is an in-person exam required before prescribing (generally or for controlled substances), are there state limits on prescribing Schedule III drugs such as testosterone by telehealth, and is the state an Interstate Medical Licensure Compact member? "Yes" means a state license and the in-person standard of care apply (opioid-only or Schedule II-only limits are described but do not change the answer); "conditional" means extra state conditions such as a telehealth registration route, an in-person exam requirement, controlled-substance limits reaching Schedule III, or registration of telehealth businesses. Federal DEA rules apply on top.
A clinician not licensed in Florida may treat Florida patients by telehealth after registering with the applicable board as a telehealth provider; registrants need liability coverage and may not open a Florida office or provide in-person care (Fla. Stat. 456.47). If the evaluation is sufficient to diagnose and treat, no prior physical exam or record review is required. Telehealth providers may not prescribe Schedule II controlled substances except for psychiatric disorders, inpatient hospital care, hospice or nursing-home residents; the statute places no telehealth-specific limit on Schedule III drugs such as testosterone. IMLC: member.
Read from the 2025 Florida Statutes edition (created 2019, amended 2020, 2022, 2023). Florida joined the IMLC through CS/SB 7016 (IMLC map dated 12/20/2024).
Fla. Stat. 456.47
- Florida Statutes 456.47 - Use of telehealth to provide services (2025) — The Florida Senate, 2026-09-23
- Florida - Professional Requirements — Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP), 2026-06-19
- IMLC Commission - Compact State Map (participating states) — Interstate Medical Licensure Compact Commission, 2026-09-23
Aesthetics, IV therapy & practice ownership
Who may inject neuromodulators and fillersFlorida has no rule specific to cosmetic injectables; RNs may administer medications and treatments "as prescribed or authorized" by a licensed practitioner, and LPNs work under RN or physician direction.RNs may inject under delegation
Who may administer botulinum toxin and dermal fillers (physicians, PAs, NPs, RNs, LPNs, estheticians, dentists), under what supervision (on-site vs available), and must a physician/NP/PA perform a prior good-faith exam?
Florida's Nurse Practice Act defines professional nursing to include administering medications and treatments as prescribed or authorized by a duly licensed practitioner, and practical nursing as administering treatments and medications under the direction of an RN or a physician, osteopathic physician, podiatrist or dentist. No Board of Medicine or Board of Nursing rule or FAQ specific to botulinum toxin or dermal fillers was found (both boards' FAQ databases were searched on 2026-09-23). Botox and fillers remain prescription products, so a licensed prescriber's order or authorization is required.
Answer rests on general RN scope, not an aesthetics-specific rule. '2026 Florida Statutes' recorded as 2026-07-01 (usual effective date). A secondary blog cited a 2023 Florida Board of Nursing declaratory statement on RN injections that could not be located.
Fla. Stat. §464.003 (2026)
- Florida Statutes §464.003 – Definitions (Nurse Practice Act) — Florida Legislature, 2026-07-01
- Frequently Asked Questions — Florida Board of Nursing, 2026-09-23
IV hydration and vitamin therapyNo Florida rule or board statement specific to elective IV hydration was found; RNs may administer IV fluids and medications as prescribed or authorized by a licensed practitioner.Standard medical/nursing rules
What does the state require for elective IV hydration/vitamin (incl. NAD+) therapy: who may start IVs, is a patient-specific order or good-faith exam required before a patient's first IV, are standing orders allowed, and are there rules for mobile IV services?
Florida's Nurse Practice Act allows RNs to administer medications and treatments as prescribed or authorized by a licensed practitioner, and LPNs to do so under RN or physician direction. Searches of the Board of Medicine and Board of Nursing FAQ databases (2026-09-23) returned no IV-hydration guidance, unlike many other states. Clinics that are not wholly owned by licensed practitioners generally need an AHCA health care clinic licence (see CPOM), and mobile clinics fall within the clinic definition.
No Florida IV-hydration statement located; Florida Board of Nursing rules on LPN IV therapy education (reported as a 30-hour course) were not fetched. Admixing vitamins into IV bags may raise Board of Pharmacy compounding issues.
Fla. Stat. §464.003 (2026); Fla. Stat. §400.9905 (mobile clinics within 'clinic' definition)
- Florida Statutes §464.003 – Definitions (Nurse Practice Act) — Florida Legislature, 2026-07-01
- Florida Statutes §400.9905 – Definitions (Health Care Clinic Act) — Florida Legislature, 2026-07-01
Corporate practice of medicine / med spa ownershipFlorida does not bar lay ownership of medical practices; instead, a med spa not wholly owned by licensed practitioners generally needs a health care clinic licence from AHCA and a medical director.No meaningful CPOM
Does the state enforce the corporate practice of medicine doctrine (non-physicians may not own medical practices or employ physicians), and how does that affect med spa ownership?
Under the Health Care Clinic Act, a 'clinic' is an entity that provides health care services and tenders charges for them (including mobile clinics). Entities wholly owned by licensed health care practitioners, or by a practitioner plus close family where the practitioner supervises the business, are exempt. A licensed clinic must have a medical director who is a physician (or a licensed practitioner whose scope covers the services if no physician services are offered). Permit Health lists Florida as 'Permitted (with conditions)' and MedPath as 'No (clinic license)'.
Exemptions in §400.9905 are detailed; check with AHCA whether a cash-only med spa model is exempt.
Fla. Stat. §§400.990–400.995, incl. §400.9905 (2026); Fla. Stat. ch. 621
- Florida Statutes §400.9905 – Definitions (Health Care Clinic Act) — Florida Legislature, 2026-07-01
- The Corporate Practice of Medicine 50-State Guide — Permit Health, 2025-12-23
Who may operate aesthetic lasersFlorida's only laser-specific rule lets licensed electrologists with laser training and certification perform laser hair removal under a trained physician's supervision (on premises or by telehealth within 150 miles), after a physician examines each new patient.Delegable with licensing/training rules
Who may perform laser/IPL/RF aesthetic procedures (laser hair removal, resurfacing): physicians only, delegated to RNs/PAs, or licensed electrologists/estheticians/laser technicians with state certification?
Board of Medicine rule 64B8-56.002 allows an electrologist to use laser or light-based devices for hair removal only after specified laser training plus a certification exam (SCMHR or a Board-approved exam), under a properly trained supervising physician who may supervise on premises or by telehealth from within 150 miles, with no more than four electrologists per physician. The initial consultation must include an examination by a physician, and written protocols, semi-annual inspections and emergency training are required. The Board's FAQ says this is the only regulation directly addressing laser hair removal; other delegation of cosmetic laser work falls under general physician delegation rules. Laser devices must be registered with the DOH Bureau of Radiation Control.
Rule last amended 2021 (over two years old, possibly stale) but current per flrules.org on 2026-09-23. FAQ entries on laser registration were updated 2026-01-21.
Fla. Admin. Code r. 64B8-56.002 (last amended 2021-03-11)
- Fla. Admin. Code R. 64B8-56.002 – Equipment and Devices; Protocols for Laser and Light-Based Devices — Cornell LII (Florida Board of Medicine rule text), 2021-03-11
- Frequently Asked Questions – Laser Treatment — Florida Board of Medicine, 2026-01-21
Labs, regenerative medicine & cosmetics
State clinical laboratory licensing (beyond CLIA)Florida no longer licenses clinical laboratory facilities (CLIA applies), but it still licenses laboratory personnel.CLIA only
Does the state license clinical laboratories itself, beyond federal CLIA certification, including out-of-state labs that test specimens from the state?
The current Florida Statutes chapter 483 contains only Part I (Clinical Laboratory Personnel, ss. 483.800-483.828), Part II (Medical Physicists) and Part III (Genetic Counseling); facility-licensure provisions no longer appear in the chapter. AHCA's Laboratory Licensing Unit is Florida's CLIA state agency. Technologists and lab directors working in Florida need Florida personnel licenses.
The date the facility-licensure part was repealed was not confirmed here. Personnel licensure still applies to Florida-based labs.
Fla. Stat. ch. 483, Part I (ss. 483.800-483.828)
- Florida Statutes Chapter 483 — contents index (2025) — Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
- CLIA State Agency Contacts (updated May 2026) — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2026-05-01
- Personnel Licensure (states with clinical laboratory personnel licensure) — American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science, 2026-09-23
Direct-to-consumer lab testingNot confirmed whether Florida consumers may order lab tests without a practitioner order. Practitioner-ordered panels are not affected.Not confirmed
May consumers order their own lab tests without a practitioner order (direct access testing)? A practitioner-ordered panel is always fine; this matters for take-home and consumer test kits.
ADLM (formerly AACC) reported in 2019 that 37 states and DC let consumers order some or all tests directly, but it did not publish the state list, and this research did not confirm Florida's rule. Florida's lab regulator (CLIA state agency) is Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, Laboratory Licensing Unit (LABSTAFF@ahca.myflorida.com, 850-412-4500). The question matters for take-home and consumer test kits, not for panels a clinician orders.
A commercial 2026 guide (Just Labs) groups Florida with states that have their own frameworks. Florida's clinical-laboratory facility statute no longer appears in ch. 483 (only personnel licensure remains). Not confirmed. The ADLM figure dates from 2019 (older than 2 years).
Not confirmed
- Direct-to-consumer laboratory testing (position statement, 2019): '37 states and the District of Columbia permit consumers to order some or all of their laboratory tests directly' — Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (formerly AACC), 2026-09-23
- CLIA State Agency Contacts (updated May 2026) — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2026-05-01
- Direct-Access Lab Testing: Complete State Guide 2026 (commercial blog; names only ~13 states) — Just Labs, 2026-04-24
- Florida Statutes Chapter 483 — contents index (2025) — Florida Legislature, 2026-09-23
State laws on stem cell / regenerative therapiesSince July 1, 2025, Florida allows MDs and DOs to perform non-FDA-approved stem cell therapy for orthopedics, wound care and pain management, if sourcing, advertising-notice and signed-consent rules are met.State-specific law
Has the state enacted a law or rule specifically about stem cell, exosome or regenerative-medicine therapies (notice/disclosure duties, permission for certain non-FDA-approved uses, or Right to Try extensions covering them)?
CS/CS/SB 1768 (ch. 2025-185) created §458.3245 (MDs) and a parallel section for DOs. 'Stem cell therapy' means treatment using afterbirth placental perinatal stem cells or HCT/Ps, excluding cells derived from a fetus or embryo after an abortion. Cells must be retrieved, manufactured and stored in an FDA-registered facility that is certified by a listed body (e.g., AATB, AABB, WMDA, NMDP), and a post-thaw viability analysis is required. Ads must carry a mandated notice ('THIS NOTICE MUST BE PROVIDED TO YOU UNDER FLORIDA LAW...') in type no smaller than the largest used, and a signed consent must cover FDA status, anticipated results, risks and alternatives. Violations are grounds for discipline; willfully performing prohibited treatments is a third-degree felony. Federal FDA rules still apply regardless of state law: stem cell, birth-tissue and exosome products are regulated by FDA, and a state law cannot make an unapproved biologic FDA-approved.
Physicians only: NPs and PAs are not authorized. Pending: CS/SB 1092 (2026) would extend similar authority to podiatric physicians, effective July 1, 2026 if enacted; its final status was not confirmed. The DO section number is from secondary sources.
Fla. Stat. §458.3245 and §459.0127 (ch. 2025-185, CS/CS/SB 1768)
- Fla. Stat. §458.3245 — Stem cell therapy (ch. 2025-185, CS/CS/SB 1768) — The Florida Senate, 2026-09-23
- New Florida Law Attempts to Provide Leeway for Certain Stem Cell Treatments — Holland & Knight LLP, 2025-08-18
- State Stem Cell Laws: Accurate 2026 Map Update (lists 12 states with statutes; commercial source) — SaveMyFat, 2026-08-06
- Bill Analysis — CS/SB 1092 (2026) Podiatric Medicine (would extend stem cell therapy authority to podiatrists) — The Florida Senate, Committee on Health Policy, 2026-02-12
State rules for cosmetics and sunscreenNo Florida-specific cosmetic or sunscreen requirements beyond federal law (MoCRA/FDA) were found.None found beyond federal
Does the state have cosmetic or sunscreen requirements beyond federal MoCRA, such as ingredient bans (PFAS, formaldehyde, phthalates), ingredient reporting, sunscreen-ingredient bans, or bans on selling animal-tested cosmetics?
Florida does not appear on 2026 compilations of state PFAS-in-cosmetics laws, on the list of states banning animal-tested cosmetics, or among the jurisdictions with sunscreen-ingredient bans. Federal MoCRA and FDA rules on cosmetics and OTC sunscreens still apply. Other state laws that touch cosmetics generally, such as state food-drug-cosmetic acts or consumer-protection laws, were not surveyed.
Florida has no state cosmetic ingredient law, but a 2020 state law (SB 172) bars local governments from regulating OTC drugs and cosmetics. That preempted Key West's planned oxybenzone/octinoxate sunscreen ban. The animal-testing list is Wikipedia's 'as of 2023' compilation (older than 2 years); effective dates were not confirmed.
None found
- PFAS in Cosmetics: US State Bans and Compliance Deadlines - 2026 Update — Adherent (formerly Compliance & Risks), 2026-03-13
- State PFAS Bans in Cosmetics Expand Ahead of 2026 (updated Jan. 14, 2026) — Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, 2026-01-14
- Testing cosmetics on animals (US state bans 'as of 2023') — Wikipedia, 2026-09-23
- Oxybenzone (Hawaii ban; Key West ban preempted by Florida SB 172) — Wikipedia, 2026-09-23
Compare every state
Out-of-state pharmacies shipping into the state. Must a pharmacy located in another state hold a license/registration from this state to ship prescriptions (including patient-specific 503A compounded preparations) to patients or practitioners here?
The federal floor, for every category
Two federal compounding lanes: §503A pharmacies vs §503B outsourcing facilitiesA §503A pharmacy (or physician) compounds for an identified patient on a prescription; a §503B outsourcing facility is FDA-registered, follows CGMP, and is the only federal lane for non-patient-specific office stock.
Under §503A, a state-licensed pharmacist or physician may compound for an identified individual patient on a valid prescription, or in limited anticipatory quantities (no more than a 30-day supply based on the compounder's own prescription history). 503A compounders are not required to follow CGMP and are not required to report adverse events to FDA. Under §503B, an outsourcing facility registers with FDA, compounds under CGMP, is inspected on a risk-based schedule, must report adverse events, and may distribute non-patient-specific product to hospitals, clinics and practitioners for office use. Neither lane makes a compounded drug 'FDA-approved'. Both lanes restrict 'essentially copies' of approved or marketed drugs and restrict which bulk ingredients may be used. FDA keeps a public list of registered outsourcing facilities (content current as of 09/08/2026).
- Prescription Requirement Under Section 503A of the FD&C Act — Guidance for Industry — FDA/CDER, 2016-12-01
- Registered Outsourcing Facilities — FDA, 2026-09-08
- FDA's Concerns with Unapproved GLP-1 Drugs Used for Weight Loss (503A adverse events not required to be reported) — FDA, 2026-09-01
'Essentially a copy' of an approved or commercially available drugFDA treats a compounded drug with the same active ingredient, a similar strength and a usable route as a marketed product as 'essentially a copy' unless the prescriber documents a patient-specific significant difference on the prescription.
503A (final guidance, Jan 2018): a drug is not 'commercially available' if it is discontinued or is in 'currently in shortage' status on FDA's drug shortage list. FDA generally considers a compounded drug a copy if it has the same API in the same, similar or easily substitutable strength by a route the commercial product can be used by. The prescriber's determination must name the change and the significant difference for that patient; a patient name plus formulation is not enough, and lower price does not count. FDA does not consider copies to be made 'regularly or in inordinate amounts' if the compounder fills four or fewer such prescriptions per calendar month. 503B (final guidance, Jan 2018): outsourcing facilities may not compound drugs identical or nearly identical to an approved drug unless it is on the shortage list; otherwise a prescriber's determination of a clinical difference must be noted on the prescription or order.
- Compounded Drug Products That Are Essentially Copies of a Commercially Available Drug Product Under Section 503A — Guidance for Industry — FDA/CDER, 2018-01-01
- Compounded Drug Products That Are Essentially Copies of Approved Drug Products Under Section 503B — Guidance for Industry — FDA/CDER, 2018-01-01
Office use / office stock of compounded drugs (federal position)FDA's position is that §503A compounding requires a prescription for an identified patient; clinics wanting non-patient-specific office stock are directed to §503B outsourcing facilities.
FDA's final 503A prescription-requirement guidance (Dec 2016) says hospitals, clinics and practitioners can obtain non-patient-specific compounded drugs from outsourcing facilities registered under §503B, which may distribute sterile and non-sterile office-use product. 503A anticipatory compounding is limited to no more than a 30-day supply based on the compounder's own prescription history. Some states allow limited 503A office use under state law, but the federal 503A exemptions still depend on patient-specific prescriptions (see state topic office_use_503a).
503B products may not be resold by anyone other than the outsourcing facilitySection 503B(a)(8) bars anyone other than the outsourcing facility from selling or transferring its compounded drugs, so a clinic, distributor or marketplace that takes ownership may not resell 503B product.
FDA's June 2023 draft guidance (still draft) says the drug should go from the outsourcing facility to the entity that dispenses or administers it. FDA does not intend to apply the prohibition to transfers to common carriers, third-party logistics providers, regulators, returns processors, waste handlers or contract test labs, or to recall-related transfers. A state-licensed pharmacy may dispense 503B product against a patient-specific prescription. Clinic-to-clinic resale is the core concern.
- Prohibition on Wholesaling Under Section 503B of the FD&C Act — Draft Guidance for Industry — FDA/CDER, 2023-06-27
Which bulk ingredients compounders may use (503A Categories 1/2/3; 503B bulks list)A 503A compounder may use a bulk ingredient only if it has a USP/NF monograph, is a component of an FDA-approved drug, or is on the 503A bulks list; FDA tolerates interim 'Category 1' substances, flags 'Category 2' as significant safety risks, and treats 'Category 3' as lacking support.
FDA's category list was updated May 14, 2026. 503A Category 2 now contains only cesium chloride, domperidone, germanium sesquioxide, ibutamoren mesylate, kisspeptin-10 and quinacrine (intrauterine use). Category 1 includes glutathione, methylcobalamin, NAD, NADH, enclomiphene citrate, GHK-Cu (non-injectable routes only), vasoactive intestinal peptide and others. GHRP-2, GHRP-6, mechano growth factor and thymulin are in Category 3. BPC-157, TB-500, CJC-1295, ipamorelin, AOD-9604, Selank, Semax, epitalon, MOTs-C, dihexa, KPV and thymosin alpha-1 are in no category, so they do not get Category 1 enforcement discretion. FDA does not intend to categorize substances nominated on or after Jan 7, 2025. The final 503B bulks list is short (e.g., diphenylcyclopropenone, glycolic acid topical up to 70%, quinacrine oral, squaric acid dibutyl ester, trichloroacetic acid); 503B Category 2 includes GHRP-2, GHRP-6, ipamorelin acetate, ibutamoren, tranilast and others.
- Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503A (Categories 1–3) — FDA, 2026-05-14
- Bulk Drug Substances Used in Compounding Under Section 503A of the FD&C Act — FDA, 2026-05-14
- Safety Risks Associated with Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding (Category 2) — FDA, 2026-04-22
- 503B Bulk Drug Substances List — FDA, 2024-05-16
- Bulk Drug Substances Used in Compounding Under Section 503B of the FD&C Act — FDA, 2025-01-07
Biologics (including hCG, tesamorelin, somatropin) cannot be compounded under 503A/503BSince March 23, 2020, protein products approved as drugs became licensed biologics, and FDA says biological products are not eligible for the 503A or 503B compounding exemptions.
The BPCI Act transition on March 23, 2020 deemed approved NDAs for biological products to be BLAs. FDA's transition list includes chorionic gonadotropin (Pregnyl, Novarel, Fresenius chorionic gonadotropin, Ovidrel), menotropins, follitropins, hyaluronidase, somatropin and tesamorelin acetate (Egrifta/Egrifta SV). FDA's notice to compounders states that 'biological products will not be eligible for the exemptions for compounded drugs under sections 503A and 503B'. Separate FDA guidance (Jan 2018) describes limited conditions for mixing, diluting or repackaging licensed biologics outside their labeling.
'Research Use Only' / 'not for human consumption' productsFDA treats RUO-labeled peptides and GLP-1s as unapproved drugs when marketing, dosing information or bundled syringes/bacteriostatic water show human use; the disclaimer does not make them lawful to administer to patients.
FDA's GLP-1 safety page says companies sold products falsely labeled 'for research purposes' or 'not for human consumption' with dosing instructions for human use. FDA has issued repeated warning-letter rounds to peptide/RUO sellers in 2026 (e.g., letters dated March 31, 2026 to Gram Peptides and others; June 17, 2026 to Wholesale Peptide; August 24, 2026 to Royal Peptides and others). Import Alert 66-41 (unapproved new drugs promoted in the U.S.) has listed, for example, a firm offering PT-141 peptide. RUO material is not a USP-grade or approved-drug-component bulk ingredient for compounding and is not a prescription drug a clinician can lawfully buy for patient use.
- FDA's Concerns with Unapproved GLP-1 Drugs Used for Weight Loss — FDA, 2026-09-01
- Warning Letter: Gram Peptides (MARCS-CMS 721806) — FDA, 2026-03-31
- Warning Letter: Wholesale Peptide (MARCS-CMS 729447) — FDA, 2026-06-17
- Warning Letter: Royal Peptides LLC (MARCS-CMS 734884) — FDA, 2026-08-24
- Import Alert 66-41: Detention Without Physical Examination of Unapproved New Drugs Promoted in the U.S. — FDA, 2026-09-11
FDA drug shortage list and why it matters for compoundingA drug in 'currently in shortage' status is not 'commercially available', so 503A/503B compounders may make copies of it; when FDA marks the shortage resolved, that permission ends (503B facilities may finish existing orders for up to 60 days).
The 503A copies guidance says a drug appears on the shortage list only if it is in 'currently in shortage' status, not 'resolved'. FDA's shortage-compounding page says compounders must still meet all other 503A conditions (including a valid patient-specific prescription), and FDA 'may take action if an outsourcing facility continues to fill new orders after the approved drug is removed from FDA's drug shortage list, or if it continues to fill existing orders more than 60 days after the drug has been removed.' The GLP-1 episode shows the effect: large-scale semaglutide and tirzepatide compounding depended on shortage status and ended after FDA resolved the shortages. A prescriber or compounder relying on a shortage should note on the prescription that the drug was on the list and the date checked.
FDA Standard MOU on interstate distribution of 503A compounded drugsThe October 2020 standard MOU is suspended after a 2021 court remand; FDA is not enforcing the statutory 5% out-of-state limit and plans a new rule, with a proposed rule projected for November 2026.
Section 503A limits a pharmacy in a state without an FDA MOU to distributing no more than 5% of its compounded prescriptions out of state. FDA published a final standard MOU in October 2020, but a federal court remanded it in September 2021. FDA 'considers the standard MOU published in October 2020 to be suspended' and, per its Oct 21, 2022 Federal Register notice, will not enforce the 5% limit until a final rule and updated MOU are published. The Fall 2025 Unified Agenda lists RIN 0910-AI71 ('Distribution of Compounded Drug Products Under Section 503A') at the proposed-rule stage with an NPRM projected for 11/2026. State nonresident-pharmacy licensing still applies (see state topics nonresident_pharmacy and fda_mou).
- Memorandum of Understanding Addressing Certain Distributions of Compounded Drugs — FDA, 2022-10-20
- Extension of the Period Before FDA Intends To Begin Enforcing the Statutory 5 Percent Limit on Out-of-State Distribution of Compounded Human Drug Products (87 FR, Oct 21, 2022) — Federal Register, 2022-10-21
- Unified Agenda, RIN 0910-AI71: Distribution of Compounded Drug Products Under Section 503A (Fall 2025) — OMB/OIRA, 2025-10-01
DEA telemedicine prescribing of controlled substances (Ryan Haight Act flexibilities)Through December 31, 2026, DEA-registered practitioners may prescribe Schedule II–V controlled substances by telemedicine without a prior in-person visit under a fourth temporary extension; the permanent special-registration rule is still pending.
The Ryan Haight Act generally requires an in-person medical evaluation before prescribing controlled substances over the internet. DEA and HHS published the Fourth Temporary Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities (90 FR 61301, Dec 31, 2025), effective Jan 1 – Dec 31, 2026. Prescriptions must still be for a legitimate medical purpose and comply with federal and state law; state telehealth and controlled-substance rules still apply (see telehealth_rx, state_csr, pdmp_mandate). The separate buprenorphine (opioid use disorder) telemedicine final rule and the VA continuity-of-care final rule, both published Jan 17, 2025, took effect Dec 31, 2025 after two delays (90 FR 13410). A Federal Register search on 2026-09-23 found no DEA special-registration final rule published in 2026. The Special Registrations for Telemedicine final rule was reported to be in OMB review as of late August 2026, with a final rule forecast for November 2026. Without a new rule or another extension, the in-person requirement returns on Jan 1, 2027.
- Fourth Temporary Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities for Prescription of Controlled Medications, 90 FR 61301 (Federal Register API record: effective Jan 1 – Dec 31, 2026) — DEA/HHS, Federal Register, 2025-12-31
- Fourth Temporary Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities for Prescription of Controlled Medications (FR Doc. 2025-24123) — DEA/HHS, Federal Register, 2025-12-31
- Expansion of Buprenorphine Treatment via Telemedicine Encounter and Continuity of Care via Telemedicine for VA Patients — effective Dec 31, 2025, 90 FR 13410 (API record) — DEA/HHS, Federal Register, 2025-03-24
- DEA and HHS Extend Telemedicine Prescribing Flexibilities Through 2026 — Holland & Knight, 2026-01-13
- DEA Prescribing of Controlled Substances (tracker) — Alliance for Connected Care, 2026-08-26
- Expansion of Buprenorphine Treatment via Telemedicine Encounter and Continuity of Care via Telemedicine for VA Patients — delay of effective date (FR Doc. 2025-05007) — DEA/HHS, Federal Register, 2025-03-24
FTC health-claim substantiation (advertising)The FTC requires competent and reliable scientific evidence, generally randomized controlled human trials, before a marketer makes health-benefit claims for any health product, including devices, tests, supplements and apps.
The FTC's Health Products Compliance Guidance (Dec 2022) replaced the 1998 supplement advertising guide. Marketers must have substantiation for every objective claim, express or implied, before it runs; for health benefits this generally means randomized, controlled human clinical testing. Qualifying disclosures must be clear and conspicuous, and advertisers are liable for misleading testimonials and endorsements. This sits alongside FDA's rules: FDA regulates labeling and intended use, and FDA warning letters in 2025–2026 target 'same as brand' and 'FDA-approved' claims for compounded drugs.
- Health Products Compliance Guidance — Federal Trade Commission, 2022-12-01
- FDA to Telehealth Companies: What to Know When Promoting Compounded Drugs — FDA, 2026-06-15
Adverse event reporting (MedWatch; 503B mandatory reporting)Clinicians and patients can report problems with drugs, biologics, devices and cosmetics to FDA's MedWatch voluntarily; 503B outsourcing facilities must report adverse events, while 503A pharmacies are not federally required to.
MedWatch accepts voluntary reports for prescription and OTC drugs, biologics (including human cell and tissue products), medical devices, combination products and cosmetics. Manufacturers, packers and distributors named on a marketed prescription drug label must file 15-day 'Alert reports' for serious and unexpected adverse experiences under 21 CFR 310.305; FDA's final guidance (Oct 2015) applies adverse event reporting to 503B outsourcing facilities. FDA notes that federal law does not require state-licensed 503A pharmacies to report adverse events, so compounded-drug events are likely under-reported. Under MoCRA, cosmetic 'responsible persons' must report serious adverse events within 15 business days.
- MedWatch: The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program — FDA, 2026-09-21
- Adverse Event Reporting for Outsourcing Facilities Under Section 503B — Guidance for Industry — FDA/CDER, 2015-10-01
- 21 CFR 310.305 — Records and reports concerning adverse drug experiences on marketed prescription drugs — eCFR, 2026-09-01
- Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA) — FDA, 2026-08-10
Where FDA enforcement shows up: warning letters, import alerts, recallsFDA posts warning letters in a searchable database, detains risky imports through import alerts (e.g., 66-80 for GLP-1 APIs, 66-41 for unapproved drugs, 80-04 for gloves, 53-21 for adulterated cosmetics), and publishes recalls in its enforcement reports.
Import alerts let FDA detain products without physical examination. Import Alert 66-80 (GLP-1 receptor agonist bulk drug substances) detains semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide, exenatide, orforglipron, retatrutide and dulaglutide APIs unless the manufacturer is on FDA's 'Green List'; FDA cited that 21% of inspected GLP-1 API makers were noncompliant with CGMP. Import Alert 66-41 covers unapproved new drugs promoted in the U.S. and has listed firms offering unapproved botulinum toxin and PT-141 peptide. Recalls, including Class I recalls of compounded glutathione in July–August 2026, appear in FDA enforcement reports and openFDA.
- FDA Warning Letters (searchable database) — FDA, 2026-09-23
- Import Alert 66-80: GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Bulk Drug Substances (Green List) — FDA, 2026-09-21
- Import Alert 66-41: Unapproved New Drugs Promoted in the U.S. — FDA, 2026-09-11
- openFDA drug enforcement (recall) query: sterile water / glutathione recalls 2023–2026 — FDA (openFDA), 2026-09-16
Compounded peptides: where things stand in September 2026FDA pulled 12 peptides out of Category 2 in April 2026 after nominators withdrew them, and its advisory committee voted in July 2026 to recommend six for the 503A bulks list, but none is on the list or in Category 1 yet, so none has federal compounding permission today.
On April 15, 2026 FDA announced that 12 peptides (BPC-157, cathelicidin LL-37, dihexa acetate, emideltide/DSIP, epitalon, GHK-Cu injectable, KPV, PEG-MGF, melanotan II, MOTs-C, Semax, TB-500) would leave Category 2 after seven days because their nominations were withdrawn; FDA's list shows the change effective April 22, 2026. Law-firm analyses stress that leaving Category 2 does not place a substance on the 503A bulks list or in Category 1. At the July 23–24, 2026 PCAC meeting, members voted to recommend BPC-157 (8–6), KPV (8–6), TB-500 (8–6), MOTs-C (7–5), epitalon (7–4) and Semax (8–5), and against emideltide (6–7); FDA staff had recommended against all of them. FDA must still decide and complete notice-and-comment rulemaking. GHK-Cu, dihexa, LL-37, PEG-MGF and melanotan II are slated for a PCAC meeting before the end of February 2027. Earlier, AOD-9604, CJC-1295, ipamorelin, thymosin alpha-1 and Selank left Category 2 in September 2024, and PCAC voted against CJC-1295 and AOD-9604 on Dec 4, 2024.
- Safety Risks Associated with Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding (Category 2; withdrawn list) — FDA, 2026-04-22
- July 23-24, 2026: Meeting of the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee — FDA, 2026-08-06
- Bulk-list bound? PCAC backs majority of peptides in two-day public meeting — McDermott (law firm), 2026-07-27
- FDA Announces Removal of 12 Peptides from Category 2 and Schedules PCAC Meetings — Orrick, 2026-04-16
- FDA to Remove 12 Popular Peptides from the Category 2 'Do Not Compound' List — Frier Levitt, 2026-09-23
- Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503A (Categories 1–3) — FDA, 2026-05-14
- Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting (July 23–24, 2026; 503A bulks nominations), 91 FR 20465 — FDA, Federal Register, 2026-04-16
Search the official databases
FDA
DEA
Registries & compacts
Every vendor on MedGrid clears document review for its category before it lists. Join free with your NPI to see wholesale pricing.
Platform terms — non-circumvention
Non-circumvention. Every introduction made through MedGrid — doctor to vendor, doctor to pharmacy, vendor to pharmacy, partner to any of them — is platform-protected. For 24 months following an introduction, the parties agree not to solicit, contract, or transact directly (or through affiliates) in a manner that circumvents MedGrid or its fees. Renewals, refills, and reorders of platform-introduced relationships run through the platform. This clause is part of every participant agreement — doctor, vendor, pharmacy, and sales partner alike — and it protects the people who make the introductions as much as it protects MedGrid.
Educational summaries of public law and agency guidance, not legal advice. Researched 2026-09-23 from the sources linked on each answer; laws, board rules and FDA policy change, so confirm with the linked agency or your counsel before you rely on an answer. Found something out of date? Tell our compliance desk.
