Regulations research

FDA and state rules, for what you actually buy.

Search a drug, ingredient or device for its live FDA record, or pick your state and a category to see the federal rules and what your state adds — each answer with its citation and source.

A physician working on a laptop in a private-practice office
Licenses and compliance: the states a vendor is licensed in and the documents it publishes, each marked verified or not
Every answer sourced
Everything for Illinois ↓

FDA records for “BPC-157”

Searching FDA approvals, shortages, recalls and device records…

← All categories

Growth hormone secretagogues

FDA pathway: Biologic (BLA) for tesamorelin/somatropin | Not FDA-approved for CJC-1295, ipamorelin, GHRPs | Compounded 503A (sermorelin, status unsettled)

Tesamorelin and somatropin are licensed biologics that cannot be compounded; CJC-1295, ipamorelin and AOD-9604 are in no 503A category after PCAC voted against CJC-1295 and AOD-9604; ibutamoren is Category 2; sermorelin's approved product was withdrawn in 2009.

On MedGrid as: Growth Hormone Secretagogues

The federal rules

Tesamorelin (Egrifta) is a biologic — not compoundableTesamorelin acetate (Egrifta/Egrifta SV) was deemed a BLA on March 23, 2020, so compounded tesamorelin falls outside 503A/503B.

FDA's transition list includes tesamorelin acetate (former NDA 022505, Theratechnologies). openFDA lists Egrifta under BLA022505.

Human growth hormone: biologic plus a criminal distribution limitSomatropin products are licensed biologics, and 21 U.S.C. 333(e) makes it a felony to distribute hGH for uses other than FDA-authorized treatment of a disease on a physician's order.

Somatropin brands (e.g., Genotropin, Humatrope, Norditropin, Omnitrope) are on FDA's March 2020 transition list. Section 333(e) carries up to 5 years (10 if a minor is involved); anti-aging or bodybuilding use is not an authorized use.

Sermorelin: approved product withdrawn; not on FDA's category listsGEREF (sermorelin acetate) approvals were withdrawn effective June 18, 2009 at the maker's request; FDA found in 2013 the products were not withdrawn for safety or effectiveness reasons.

Sermorelin does not appear in any 503A category. Pharmacies commonly compound it under 503A, relying on its history as an approved drug's active ingredient; FDA has not published a sermorelin-specific compounding statement that was found, and whether a withdrawn approval satisfies the 'component of an FDA-approved drug' criterion is not confirmed here.

CJC-1295 and AOD-9604: PCAC voted againstBoth left Category 2 in Sept 2024, then PCAC voted on Dec 4, 2024 not to add CJC-1295 forms (0–13 or 1–12) or AOD-9604 (0–12) to the 503A bulks list; they are now in no category.

Transcript records votes on CJC-1295 free base, acetate, DAC free base, DAC acetate and DAC trifluoroacetate, and on AOD-9604 free base/acetate.

Ipamorelin, GHRP-2/6, ibutamoren, kisspeptinIpamorelin is in no 503A category (withdrawn Sept 2024) but is 503B Category 2; GHRP-2 and GHRP-6 are 503A Category 3 and 503B Category 2; ibutamoren (MK-677) is Category 2 for both; kisspeptin-10 is 503A Category 2.

PCAC's Oct 29, 2024 meeting reviewed ipamorelin, ibutamoren and kisspeptin-10 with FDA recommending none be included (per law-firm summary).

Changing now

What Illinois adds

Out-of-state pharmacies shipping into the stateAn out-of-state pharmacy needs an Illinois nonresident pharmacy license from IDFPR to ship prescriptions to Illinois residents, and since January 1, 2026 its pharmacist-in-charge must hold an Illinois pharmacist license.License required

Must a pharmacy located in another state hold a license/registration from this state to ship prescriptions (including patient-specific 503A compounded preparations) to patients or practitioners here?

225 ILCS 85/16a and 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.550 require nonresident pharmacies that dispense for Illinois residents and mail, ship or deliver prescription drugs into Illinois to hold an Illinois nonresident pharmacy license/registration from the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR). Conditions include a home-state license, disclosure of officers and dispensing pharmacists, cooperation with the Board, readily retrievable records of drugs dispensed to Illinois residents, and a toll-free pharmacist line (at least 6 days/40 hours per week) printed on every label. Rule 1330.550 states that beginning January 1, 2026 the pharmacist-in-charge of a nonresident pharmacy must be licensed in Illinois; other pharmacists need not be. The IDFPR application (packet updated 1/15/26) asks nonresident applicants for a home-state certification of licensure, home-state pharmacy and controlled-substance licenses, DEA registration and the most recent inspection report, and lists 'Sterile Compounding Pharmacy' as an operation type to check; nonresident pharmacies must follow Illinois law when filling for Illinois residents unless it directly conflicts with home-state law.

The official ILGA statute site blocked automated fetching; the statute text was confirmed from FindLaw's copy (current as of 2025-01-01) and the rule from Cornell LII. The Illinois-licensed PIC requirement for nonresident pharmacies took effect 2026-01-01 (68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.550, 48 Ill. Reg. 10225). No separate nonresident sterile-compounding license beyond checking the sterile compounding operation type was found.

225 ILCS 85/16a; 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.550

Current as of 2026-01-15 · Checked against the primary source

Office-use compounding from 503A pharmaciesIllinois lets a pharmacy supply a reasonable quantity of NONSTERILE compounded drugs to a practitioner for office use, labeled 'For Office Use Only - Not for Resale'; sterile office-use compounding is prohibited unless the compounder is a 503B outsourcing facility with an Illinois wholesale drug distributor license.Allowed with limits

May a 503A (traditional) pharmacy dispense or distribute compounded preparations to a practitioner for office use (administration in the office, not patient-specific)? The federal position is that 503A requires patient-specific prescriptions; this is what the state pharmacy act and board rules allow.

68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.640(b) defines office use as a practitioner administering a non-patient-specific compounded drug in the office or a health care facility/treatment setting. Under 1330.640(d) a pharmacist may dispense and deliver a reasonable quantity of a nonsterile compounded drug to a practitioner for office use if the quantity does not exceed what the practitioner expects to use before the beyond-use date, is reasonable for the practice, and does not exceed the pharmacy's capacity to compound to USP-consistent standards; the pharmacy must keep records for 5 years (practitioner, drug, compounding and delivery dates, lot number, BUD) and label the product with lot, BUD, storage and 'For Office Use Only - Not for Resale.' Under 1330.640(c) sterile compounding for office use is prohibited unless the pharmacy fully complies with 21 USC 353b, including registering as an outsourcing facility and being licensed as a wholesale drug distributor under 225 ILCS 120; sterile compounded drugs may still be delivered to the prescriber's office on a patient-specific prescription. IDFPR enforces. The nonsterile office-use allowance is broader than FDA's view that 503A compounding requires patient-specific prescriptions.

The rule does not say whether a nonresident pharmacy may ship nonsterile office-use stock into Illinois; nonresident pharmacies must follow Illinois law when serving Illinois (1330.550), so the same limits would apply, but this is not expressly addressed. The official ILGA/JCAR host blocked automated fetching; text confirmed via Cornell LII. Stale-source flag: the controlling text is dated 2024-06-28 (more than 2 years before 2026-09-23); it is the latest version found, but confirm with the board that it is still current.

68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.640(b), (c), (d)

Current as of 2024-06-28 · Checked against the primary source

Prescribing by telehealthIllinois requires an Illinois license or permit to practice telemedicine on patients in Illinois, with narrow exceptions, and no Illinois telehealth-specific Schedule III limit was found.Allowed (standard rules)

For a patient located in the state: must the prescriber hold this state's license (or a telehealth registration or special license), is an in-person exam required before prescribing (generally or for controlled substances), are there state limits on prescribing Schedule III drugs such as testosterone by telehealth, and is the state an Interstate Medical Licensure Compact member? "Yes" means a state license and the in-person standard of care apply (opioid-only or Schedule II-only limits are described but do not change the answer); "conditional" means extra state conditions such as a telehealth registration route, an in-person exam requirement, controlled-substance limits reaching Schedule III, or registration of telehealth businesses. Federal DEA rules apply on top.

225 ILCS 60/49.5 makes practicing telemedicine on Illinois patients without an Illinois license or permit subject to penalties; excluded are periodic consultations with an Illinois licensee, second opinions, follow-up care after treatment in the provider's own state, and care for existing patients who are traveling. Telehealth prescribing follows the ordinary standard of care; no Illinois statute found adds an in-person requirement or a telehealth-specific controlled-substance limit. An Illinois controlled substance license is needed to prescribe testosterone. IMLC: member.

Section 49.5 is scheduled for repeal January 1, 2032 with the Medical Practice Act sunset.

225 ILCS 60/49.5

Current as of 2026-09-23 · Checked against the primary source

Who may inject neuromodulators and fillersIllinois physicians may delegate patient-care tasks such as cosmetic injections to RNs and LPNs, by standing orders or protocols if they choose, within a physician-patient relationship; unlicensed staff may be used only with a licensed professional on site.RNs may inject under delegation

Who may administer botulinum toxin and dermal fillers (physicians, PAs, NPs, RNs, LPNs, estheticians, dentists), under what supervision (on-site vs available), and must a physician/NP/PA perform a prior good-faith exam?

Section 54.2 of the Medical Practice Act says nothing limits a physician's delegation of patient-care tasks to an RN, LPN or other licensee acting within their own licensing act, and that delegation may be made by any means, including standing orders, protocols, guidelines or verbal orders. In an office setting and within a physician-patient relationship, a physician may delegate to a trained unlicensed person only if a licensed health care professional is on site. Delegated tasks must be within the physician's own scope and training. No Illinois rule specific to neuromodulators or fillers was found.

Answer rests on the general delegation statute. IDFPR/Board of Nursing guidance on cosmetic injectables was not located.

225 ILCS 60/54.2 (as amended by P.A. 104-796, eff. 2026-08-07)

Current as of 2026-08-07 · Checked against the primary source

Illinois at a glance

Every topic we research, for Illinois. Open any line for the rule, its citation and the source.

Pharmacy & compounding

Out-of-state pharmacies shipping into the stateAn out-of-state pharmacy needs an Illinois nonresident pharmacy license from IDFPR to ship prescriptions to Illinois residents, and since January 1, 2026 its pharmacist-in-charge must hold an Illinois pharmacist license.License required

Must a pharmacy located in another state hold a license/registration from this state to ship prescriptions (including patient-specific 503A compounded preparations) to patients or practitioners here?

225 ILCS 85/16a and 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.550 require nonresident pharmacies that dispense for Illinois residents and mail, ship or deliver prescription drugs into Illinois to hold an Illinois nonresident pharmacy license/registration from the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR). Conditions include a home-state license, disclosure of officers and dispensing pharmacists, cooperation with the Board, readily retrievable records of drugs dispensed to Illinois residents, and a toll-free pharmacist line (at least 6 days/40 hours per week) printed on every label. Rule 1330.550 states that beginning January 1, 2026 the pharmacist-in-charge of a nonresident pharmacy must be licensed in Illinois; other pharmacists need not be. The IDFPR application (packet updated 1/15/26) asks nonresident applicants for a home-state certification of licensure, home-state pharmacy and controlled-substance licenses, DEA registration and the most recent inspection report, and lists 'Sterile Compounding Pharmacy' as an operation type to check; nonresident pharmacies must follow Illinois law when filling for Illinois residents unless it directly conflicts with home-state law.

The official ILGA statute site blocked automated fetching; the statute text was confirmed from FindLaw's copy (current as of 2025-01-01) and the rule from Cornell LII. The Illinois-licensed PIC requirement for nonresident pharmacies took effect 2026-01-01 (68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.550, 48 Ill. Reg. 10225). No separate nonresident sterile-compounding license beyond checking the sterile compounding operation type was found.

225 ILCS 85/16a; 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.550

Current as of 2026-01-15 · Checked against the primary source

Office-use compounding from 503A pharmaciesIllinois lets a pharmacy supply a reasonable quantity of NONSTERILE compounded drugs to a practitioner for office use, labeled 'For Office Use Only - Not for Resale'; sterile office-use compounding is prohibited unless the compounder is a 503B outsourcing facility with an Illinois wholesale drug distributor license.Allowed with limits

May a 503A (traditional) pharmacy dispense or distribute compounded preparations to a practitioner for office use (administration in the office, not patient-specific)? The federal position is that 503A requires patient-specific prescriptions; this is what the state pharmacy act and board rules allow.

68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.640(b) defines office use as a practitioner administering a non-patient-specific compounded drug in the office or a health care facility/treatment setting. Under 1330.640(d) a pharmacist may dispense and deliver a reasonable quantity of a nonsterile compounded drug to a practitioner for office use if the quantity does not exceed what the practitioner expects to use before the beyond-use date, is reasonable for the practice, and does not exceed the pharmacy's capacity to compound to USP-consistent standards; the pharmacy must keep records for 5 years (practitioner, drug, compounding and delivery dates, lot number, BUD) and label the product with lot, BUD, storage and 'For Office Use Only - Not for Resale.' Under 1330.640(c) sterile compounding for office use is prohibited unless the pharmacy fully complies with 21 USC 353b, including registering as an outsourcing facility and being licensed as a wholesale drug distributor under 225 ILCS 120; sterile compounded drugs may still be delivered to the prescriber's office on a patient-specific prescription. IDFPR enforces. The nonsterile office-use allowance is broader than FDA's view that 503A compounding requires patient-specific prescriptions.

The rule does not say whether a nonresident pharmacy may ship nonsterile office-use stock into Illinois; nonresident pharmacies must follow Illinois law when serving Illinois (1330.550), so the same limits would apply, but this is not expressly addressed. The official ILGA/JCAR host blocked automated fetching; text confirmed via Cornell LII. Stale-source flag: the controlling text is dated 2024-06-28 (more than 2 years before 2026-09-23); it is the latest version found, but confirm with the board that it is still current.

68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.640(b), (c), (d)

Current as of 2024-06-28 · Checked against the primary source

503B outsourcing facilities shipping into the stateIllinois has no separate outsourcing-facility license, but an out-of-state 503B shipping non-patient-specific drugs into Illinois needs an Illinois wholesale drug distributor license from IDFPR, plus a nonresident pharmacy license if it fills patient-specific prescriptions.State license required

Does the state require an FDA-registered 503B outsourcing facility located outside the state to hold a state license/registration (as an outsourcing facility, nonresident manufacturer, wholesaler or pharmacy) before shipping into the state?

The Wholesale Drug Distribution Licensing Act requires every nonresident wholesale distributor that ships prescription drugs into Illinois to be licensed in Illinois (225 ILCS 120/25), and the Act's definitions include manufacturers within 'wholesale drug distributor' (225 ILCS 120/15). The pharmacy compounding rule ties office-use sterile compounding to both federal 503B registration and an Illinois wholesale drug distributor license (68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.640(c)). The IDFPR wholesale application (packet updated 7/24/25) asks out-of-state facilities for a home-state certification of licensure, home-state distributor and controlled-substance licenses, DEA registration and the most recent inspection report, and offers a 'Manufacturer' distributor category; IDFPR's license list has no outsourcing-facility category. Dispensing patient-specific prescriptions to Illinois residents falls under the nonresident pharmacy license (225 ILCS 85/16a).

No Illinois statute or rule found that names an 'outsourcing facility' license; the wholesale-distributor route is inferred from 225 ILCS 120/25 plus the express reference in 1330.640(c). It is worth confirming the credential type with IDFPR's Drug Compliance Unit for a specific 503B. The official ILGA host blocked automated fetching; statute text confirmed from FindLaw's copy.

225 ILCS 120/15, 120/25; 68 Ill. Adm. Code 1330.640(c)

Current as of 2025-07-24 · Checked against the primary source

FDA compounding MOUIllinois has not signed FDA's standard compounding MOU, so under the statute its 503A pharmacies are limited to 5% out-of-state distribution, although FDA is not enforcing that limit while it rewrites the MOU.Not signed

Has the state signed FDA's standard Memorandum of Understanding Addressing Certain Distributions of Compounded Human Drug Products (October 2020)? If not, FD&C Act §503A limits its 503A pharmacies' out-of-state distribution to 5% of total prescription orders (currently not enforced by FDA pending rulemaking).

Signing the standard MOU means the state board agrees to investigate complaints about compounded drugs its 503A pharmacies ship out of state and to identify and report to FDA pharmacies that distribute "inordinate amounts" interstate (more than 50% of their compounded prescriptions); in exchange, the statutory 5% out-of-state cap in FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B) does not apply to that state's pharmacies. FDA lists only Colorado, Kentucky and New Hampshire as signatories; Illinois is not among them. For a non-signing state, FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B)(ii) caps a 503A pharmacy's out-of-state distribution of compounded drugs at 5% of its total prescription orders. FDA now considers the October 2020 standard MOU suspended (it does not expect signatory states to carry out MOU activities and will not sign new ones) and is not enforcing the 5% limit until a final rule and an updated MOU are published; FDA's rulemaking (RIN 0910-AI71) listed a proposed rule for 11/2026 in the Fall 2025 Unified Agenda.

The FDA list of signed MOUs (current as of 2023-01-23) is older than 2 years, but FDA stopped entering new agreements under the 2020 MOU in October 2022, so no state can have signed since. The FDA "Compounding Information for States" page (current as of 2026-08-28) still describes the MOU as awaiting rulemaking. Pending: FDA proposed rule on 503A distribution (RIN 0910-AI71, NPRM projected 11/2026); H.R. 5316 (introduced 2025-09-11, referred to House Energy & Commerce) would remove the MOU provision from §503A.

FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B) (21 U.S.C. 353a(b)(3)(B))

Current as of 2026-08-28 · Checked against the primary source

Prescribing, dispensing & telehealth

State controlled-substance registrationIllinois requires every practitioner who prescribes, administers, stores or dispenses controlled substances to hold an Illinois Controlled Substance license from IDFPR, which is a prerequisite for the federal DEA registration.State CS registration required

Besides DEA registration, does the state require practitioners to hold a separate state controlled substance registration, license or permit to prescribe, administer or dispense controlled substances (e.g. testosterone, Schedule III)? "Conditional" means a state registration is needed only in some settings, such as keeping controlled-substance stock in the office.

720 ILCS 570/302(a) requires every person who dispenses controlled substances in Illinois to obtain a registration from the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, and 'dispense' is defined to include prescribing and administering (570/102). IDFPR's application instructions state that every person who prescribes and/or stores or dispenses controlled substances in Illinois must obtain the license, that a separate registration is required for each place of practice where controlled substances are stored or dispensed, that the fee is $5, and that the state registration is a prerequisite for federal DEA registration with the same address. Separate CS license types exist for physicians, PAs, APRNs and full-practice APRNs; the physician CS license renews with the physician license (the 2026 renewal deadline was extended to Aug. 31, 2026).

Since July 2024 IDFPR lets physicians, PAs and APRNs apply for the CS license at the same time as the professional license. A CS registration is not issued on a temporary license. Per-location: separate registration where controlled substances are stored or dispensed.

720 ILCS 570/302; 720 ILCS 570/102

Current as of 2026-09-23 · Checked against the primary source

PDMP check before prescribingIllinois requires a documented PMP check only for initial Schedule II narcotic (e.g., opioid) prescriptions, expanding on Jan 1, 2027 to Schedule II stimulants, Schedule II opioids and Schedule IV benzodiazepines - testosterone is not covered.Required for some drugs only

Must a prescriber query the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program before prescribing, and does the mandate cover Schedule III drugs such as testosterone? "Yes" means a mandate that reaches Schedule III; "conditional" means a mandate limited to certain drugs (e.g. opioids or benzodiazepines) or situations; "no" means no prescriber query mandate.

Every prescriber with an Illinois controlled substance license must register with the PMP. Under current 720 ILCS 570/314.5(c-5), the prescriber or designee must document an attempt to access the PMP when providing an initial prescription for Schedule II narcotics such as opioids, except for oncology or palliative care or a 7-day or less supply from a hospital emergency department for an acute, traumatic condition. The section does not apply to hospital or institutional inpatients/residents. P.A. 104-512 (effective 1-1-2027) changes the trigger to initial prescriptions for Schedule II stimulants and all prescriptions for Schedule II opioids and Schedule IV benzodiazepines.

Testosterone (C-III) is not caught under either version. Change pending: P.A. 104-512 effective January 1, 2027 widens the mandate (Schedule II stimulants initial Rx; every Schedule II opioid and Schedule IV benzodiazepine Rx) and adds a safe harbor for registration failures caused by technical problems.

720 ILCS 570/314.5(c-5), (f); P.A. 104-512 (eff. 1-1-27)

Current as of 2026-09-23 · Checked against the primary source

Physicians dispensing from the officeIllinois physicians may buy and dispense legend drugs in the regular course of practice, with labeling, recordkeeping and a required offer of a written prescription.Allowed

May physicians dispense prescription drugs (not just administer them) directly to patients from their practice? "Yes" means allowed under standard rules (labeling, records, and at most a simple notice to the board); "conditional" means a separate dispensing registration, permit or license, or quantity, day-supply or drug-category limits; "no" means prohibited except narrow exceptions.

225 ILCS 60/33 authorizes physicians licensed in all branches to purchase and dispense legend drugs; dispensing must be the physician's personal act or be directly supervised. Except for samples or up to a 72-hour supply, the physician keeps a prescription file as the Pharmacy Practice Act requires. Labels must show date, patient, dispenser's last name, directions, and drug name, dose and quantity. Before dispensing, the physician must offer a written prescription the patient may fill anywhere. Controlled substances also require an Illinois controlled substance license.

Section last amended by P.A. 98-1140 (eff. 12-30-14) and is scheduled for repeal January 1, 2032 with the Medical Practice Act sunset. Source older than 2 years but still the current text at access.

225 ILCS 60/33

Current as of 2014-12-30 · Checked against the primary source

Prescribing by telehealthIllinois requires an Illinois license or permit to practice telemedicine on patients in Illinois, with narrow exceptions, and no Illinois telehealth-specific Schedule III limit was found.Allowed (standard rules)

For a patient located in the state: must the prescriber hold this state's license (or a telehealth registration or special license), is an in-person exam required before prescribing (generally or for controlled substances), are there state limits on prescribing Schedule III drugs such as testosterone by telehealth, and is the state an Interstate Medical Licensure Compact member? "Yes" means a state license and the in-person standard of care apply (opioid-only or Schedule II-only limits are described but do not change the answer); "conditional" means extra state conditions such as a telehealth registration route, an in-person exam requirement, controlled-substance limits reaching Schedule III, or registration of telehealth businesses. Federal DEA rules apply on top.

225 ILCS 60/49.5 makes practicing telemedicine on Illinois patients without an Illinois license or permit subject to penalties; excluded are periodic consultations with an Illinois licensee, second opinions, follow-up care after treatment in the provider's own state, and care for existing patients who are traveling. Telehealth prescribing follows the ordinary standard of care; no Illinois statute found adds an in-person requirement or a telehealth-specific controlled-substance limit. An Illinois controlled substance license is needed to prescribe testosterone. IMLC: member.

Section 49.5 is scheduled for repeal January 1, 2032 with the Medical Practice Act sunset.

225 ILCS 60/49.5

Current as of 2026-09-23 · Checked against the primary source

Aesthetics, IV therapy & practice ownership

Who may inject neuromodulators and fillersIllinois physicians may delegate patient-care tasks such as cosmetic injections to RNs and LPNs, by standing orders or protocols if they choose, within a physician-patient relationship; unlicensed staff may be used only with a licensed professional on site.RNs may inject under delegation

Who may administer botulinum toxin and dermal fillers (physicians, PAs, NPs, RNs, LPNs, estheticians, dentists), under what supervision (on-site vs available), and must a physician/NP/PA perform a prior good-faith exam?

Section 54.2 of the Medical Practice Act says nothing limits a physician's delegation of patient-care tasks to an RN, LPN or other licensee acting within their own licensing act, and that delegation may be made by any means, including standing orders, protocols, guidelines or verbal orders. In an office setting and within a physician-patient relationship, a physician may delegate to a trained unlicensed person only if a licensed health care professional is on site. Delegated tasks must be within the physician's own scope and training. No Illinois rule specific to neuromodulators or fillers was found.

Answer rests on the general delegation statute. IDFPR/Board of Nursing guidance on cosmetic injectables was not located.

225 ILCS 60/54.2 (as amended by P.A. 104-796, eff. 2026-08-07)

Current as of 2026-08-07 · Checked against the primary source

IV hydration and vitamin therapyNo Illinois IV-hydration rule was found; physicians may delegate IV administration to RNs and LPNs, including by standing orders or protocols, within a physician-patient relationship.Standard medical/nursing rules

What does the state require for elective IV hydration/vitamin (incl. NAD+) therapy: who may start IVs, is a patient-specific order or good-faith exam required before a patient's first IV, are standing orders allowed, and are there rules for mobile IV services?

225 ILCS 60/54.2 allows delegation of patient-care tasks to RNs and LPNs within their licensing act, by any method including standing orders and protocols, and requires delegated tasks to be within the context of a physician-patient relationship. APRNs without full practice authority collaborate with physicians under written agreements (§54.5). No IDFPR statement on elective IV hydration, prior exams or mobile IV services was located.

The 'physician-patient relationship' condition still implies an individual relationship with each patient. Check IDFPR for IV-hydration guidance.

225 ILCS 60/54.2; 225 ILCS 60/54.5

Current as of 2026-08-07 · Checked against the primary source

Corporate practice of medicine / med spa ownershipIllinois strictly applies the corporate practice of medicine doctrine (with a hospital exception), so med spas' medical services must be in physician-owned entities, typically paired with an MSO.Strong CPOM

Does the state enforce the corporate practice of medicine doctrine (non-physicians may not own medical practices or employ physicians), and how does that affect med spa ownership?

Permit Health's 2025 guide classifies Illinois as strict, citing 225 ILCS 60/22, Dr. Allison, Dentist, Inc. v. Allison (1935) and Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center (which recognized a licensed-hospital exception). MedPath Compliance (reviewed 2026-06-20) also rates Illinois strict and reports that HB 5000, a health-care transaction notice bill, passed both chambers on 2026-05-28.

Year of the Berlin decision is from general knowledge of the case; Permit Health cites it without a year.

225 ILCS 60/22; Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Ctr. (Ill. 1996) (as reported by Permit Health)

Current as of 2026-06-20 · From a dated compilation

Who may operate aesthetic lasersIllinois lets physicians delegate non-ablative laser procedures such as hair removal to trained RNs and LPNs; a prior on-site physician exam can be skipped only if an APRN examines the patient, a delegation protocol is followed and a physician is reachable by phone.Delegable with licensing/training rules

Who may perform laser/IPL/RF aesthetic procedures (laser hair removal, resurfacing): physicians only, delegated to RNs/PAs, or licensed electrologists/estheticians/laser technicians with state certification?

225 ILCS 60/54.2(e) authorizes IDFPR rules on physician delegation, including the use of light-emitting devices, and provides that an on-site physician examination before a non-ablative laser procedure is not required when (1) the laser hair removal facility follows a physician delegation protocol available to the Department, (2) the exam is done by an APRN, (3) the procedure is delegated by a physician and performed by an RN or LPN with documented training on each system, and (4) a physician is available by phone or electronically. Unlicensed persons may perform delegated tasks only in an office setting with a licensed professional on site (§54.2(b)).

The underlying IDFPR rule that otherwise requires an on-site physician exam was not fetched. The section was amended by P.A. 104-796 effective 2026-08-07; the specific change was not compared.

225 ILCS 60/54.2(b), (e) (as amended by P.A. 104-796, eff. 2026-08-07)

Current as of 2026-08-07 · Checked against the primary source

Labs, regenerative medicine & cosmetics

State clinical laboratory licensing (beyond CLIA)Not confirmed. No Illinois lab license beyond CLIA was found in the sources reviewed, but its absence was not verified.Not confirmed

Does the state license clinical laboratories itself, beyond federal CLIA certification, including out-of-state labs that test specimens from the state?

Most states rely on federal CLIA certification alone. The states confirmed in this research as issuing their own lab licenses are California, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Rhode Island (which also reach out-of-state labs testing specimens from their residents), plus Nevada, Washington, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New Hampshire (labs located in the state). Illinois was not among them, but this research did not confirm its statutes. Illinois's CLIA state agency is Illinois Dept. of Public Health, Division of Health Care Facilities & Programs (DPH.CLIA@illinois.gov, 217-782-6747); it can confirm whether any state license or permit applies, including to out-of-state labs.

Absence of a state license was not verified against the state's statutes or rules.

Not confirmed

Current as of 2026-05-01 · Not independently confirmed

Direct-to-consumer lab testingNot confirmed whether Illinois consumers may order lab tests without a practitioner order. Practitioner-ordered panels are not affected.Not confirmed

May consumers order their own lab tests without a practitioner order (direct access testing)? A practitioner-ordered panel is always fine; this matters for take-home and consumer test kits.

ADLM (formerly AACC) reported in 2019 that 37 states and DC let consumers order some or all tests directly, but it did not publish the state list, and this research did not confirm Illinois's rule. Illinois's lab regulator (CLIA state agency) is Illinois Dept. of Public Health, Division of Health Care Facilities & Programs (DPH.CLIA@illinois.gov, 217-782-6747). The question matters for take-home and consumer test kits, not for panels a clinician orders.

A commercial 2026 guide (Just Labs) groups Illinois with partially restrictive states; not confirmed against state law. The ADLM figure dates from 2019 (older than 2 years).

Not confirmed

Current as of 2026-09-23 · Not independently confirmed

State laws on stem cell / regenerative therapiesNo Illinois law specific to stem cell, exosome or regenerative therapies was found, so FDA rules and general medical-practice rules apply.No state-specific law (FDA rules apply)

Has the state enacted a law or rule specifically about stem cell, exosome or regenerative-medicine therapies (notice/disclosure duties, permission for certain non-FDA-approved uses, or Right to Try extensions covering them)?

Compilations of state stem-cell laws from 2024 to 2026 list about a dozen states with specific laws (California, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington and Wyoming), plus Montana's general experimental-treatment law and Kansas's state stem cell center. Illinois is not among them. Without a state-specific law, regenerative products are governed by federal FDA rules plus the state's general medical practice, advertising and consumer-protection laws, enforced by its medical board. Federal FDA rules still apply regardless of state law: stem cell, birth-tissue and exosome products are regulated by FDA, and a state law cannot make an unapproved biologic FDA-approved.

The finding of no law rests on multi-state compilations (a commercial one from Aug 2026 and a peer-reviewed one from Feb 2024, which is older than 2 years) and targeted searches, not a statute-by-statute review, and neither compilation is exhaustive. General Right to Try laws for terminal patients, where they exist, were not reviewed here.

State rules for cosmetics and sunscreenIllinois bans the sale of animal-tested cosmetics and will ban cosmetics with intentionally added PFAS from Jan 1, 2032.State cosmetic/sunscreen rules

Does the state have cosmetic or sunscreen requirements beyond federal MoCRA, such as ingredient bans (PFAS, formaldehyde, phthalates), ingredient reporting, sunscreen-ingredient bans, or bans on selling animal-tested cosmetics?

Illinois is listed among the states banning the sale of cosmetics tested on animals. Under SB 561 as amended by HB 2516, selling, offering or distributing cosmetics with intentionally added PFAS will be prohibited from Jan 1, 2032.

The animal-testing list is Wikipedia's 'as of 2023' compilation (older than 2 years); effective dates were not confirmed. Federal MoCRA and FDA cosmetic and OTC sunscreen rules apply in every state.

Illinois PFAS law (SB 561, amended by HB 2516), per 2026 compilations; Illinois cosmetic animal-testing law (citation not confirmed)

Current as of 2026-03-13 · From a dated compilation

Compare every state

Who may inject neuromodulators and fillers. Who may administer botulinum toxin and dermal fillers (physicians, PAs, NPs, RNs, LPNs, estheticians, dentists), under what supervision (on-site vs available), and must a physician/NP/PA perform a prior good-faith exam?

RNs may inject under delegation · 9RNs may inject with added conditions · 20RNs may not inject · 2Not confirmed · 20
Alaska: Not confirmedAlabama: RNs may not injectArkansas: Not confirmedArizona: Not confirmedCalifornia: RNs may inject with added conditionsColorado: RNs may inject under delegationConnecticut: Not confirmedWashington DC: Not confirmedDelaware: Not confirmedFlorida: RNs may inject under delegationGeorgia: Not confirmedHawaii: Not confirmedIowa: Not confirmedIdaho: Not confirmedIndiana: Not confirmedKansas: Not confirmedKentucky: RNs may inject with added conditionsLouisiana: RNs may inject with added conditionsMassachusetts: Not confirmedMaryland: RNs may inject with added conditionsMaine: Not confirmedMichigan: RNs may inject under delegationMinnesota: Not confirmedMissouri: Not confirmedMississippi: Not confirmedMontana: RNs may inject under delegationNorth Carolina: RNs may inject with added conditionsNorth Dakota: RNs may inject with added conditionsNebraska: RNs may inject with added conditionsNew Hampshire: Not confirmedNew Jersey: Not confirmedNew Mexico: RNs may inject with added conditionsNevada: RNs may inject with added conditionsNew York: RNs may inject with added conditionsOhio: RNs may inject with added conditionsOklahoma: RNs may inject with added conditionsOregon: RNs may inject under delegationPennsylvania: RNs may inject under delegationRhode Island: RNs may not injectSouth Carolina: RNs may inject with added conditionsSouth Dakota: RNs may inject with added conditionsTennessee: RNs may inject with added conditionsTexas: RNs may inject with added conditionsUtah: RNs may inject with added conditionsVirginia: RNs may inject under delegationVermont: RNs may inject with added conditionsWashington: RNs may inject with added conditionsWisconsin: RNs may inject under delegationWest Virginia: Not confirmedWyoming: RNs may inject with added conditionsIllinois: RNs may inject under delegationConnecticut: Not confirmedCTWashington DC: Not confirmedDCDelaware: Not confirmedDEMassachusetts: Not confirmedMAMaryland: RNs may inject with added conditionsMDNew Hampshire: Not confirmedNHNew Jersey: Not confirmedNJRhode Island: RNs may not injectRIVermont: RNs may inject with added conditionsVT

The federal floor, for every category

Two federal compounding lanes: §503A pharmacies vs §503B outsourcing facilitiesA §503A pharmacy (or physician) compounds for an identified patient on a prescription; a §503B outsourcing facility is FDA-registered, follows CGMP, and is the only federal lane for non-patient-specific office stock.

Under §503A, a state-licensed pharmacist or physician may compound for an identified individual patient on a valid prescription, or in limited anticipatory quantities (no more than a 30-day supply based on the compounder's own prescription history). 503A compounders are not required to follow CGMP and are not required to report adverse events to FDA. Under §503B, an outsourcing facility registers with FDA, compounds under CGMP, is inspected on a risk-based schedule, must report adverse events, and may distribute non-patient-specific product to hospitals, clinics and practitioners for office use. Neither lane makes a compounded drug 'FDA-approved'. Both lanes restrict 'essentially copies' of approved or marketed drugs and restrict which bulk ingredients may be used. FDA keeps a public list of registered outsourcing facilities (content current as of 09/08/2026).

'Essentially a copy' of an approved or commercially available drugFDA treats a compounded drug with the same active ingredient, a similar strength and a usable route as a marketed product as 'essentially a copy' unless the prescriber documents a patient-specific significant difference on the prescription.

503A (final guidance, Jan 2018): a drug is not 'commercially available' if it is discontinued or is in 'currently in shortage' status on FDA's drug shortage list. FDA generally considers a compounded drug a copy if it has the same API in the same, similar or easily substitutable strength by a route the commercial product can be used by. The prescriber's determination must name the change and the significant difference for that patient; a patient name plus formulation is not enough, and lower price does not count. FDA does not consider copies to be made 'regularly or in inordinate amounts' if the compounder fills four or fewer such prescriptions per calendar month. 503B (final guidance, Jan 2018): outsourcing facilities may not compound drugs identical or nearly identical to an approved drug unless it is on the shortage list; otherwise a prescriber's determination of a clinical difference must be noted on the prescription or order.

Office use / office stock of compounded drugs (federal position)FDA's position is that §503A compounding requires a prescription for an identified patient; clinics wanting non-patient-specific office stock are directed to §503B outsourcing facilities.

FDA's final 503A prescription-requirement guidance (Dec 2016) says hospitals, clinics and practitioners can obtain non-patient-specific compounded drugs from outsourcing facilities registered under §503B, which may distribute sterile and non-sterile office-use product. 503A anticipatory compounding is limited to no more than a 30-day supply based on the compounder's own prescription history. Some states allow limited 503A office use under state law, but the federal 503A exemptions still depend on patient-specific prescriptions (see state topic office_use_503a).

503B products may not be resold by anyone other than the outsourcing facilitySection 503B(a)(8) bars anyone other than the outsourcing facility from selling or transferring its compounded drugs, so a clinic, distributor or marketplace that takes ownership may not resell 503B product.

FDA's June 2023 draft guidance (still draft) says the drug should go from the outsourcing facility to the entity that dispenses or administers it. FDA does not intend to apply the prohibition to transfers to common carriers, third-party logistics providers, regulators, returns processors, waste handlers or contract test labs, or to recall-related transfers. A state-licensed pharmacy may dispense 503B product against a patient-specific prescription. Clinic-to-clinic resale is the core concern.

Which bulk ingredients compounders may use (503A Categories 1/2/3; 503B bulks list)A 503A compounder may use a bulk ingredient only if it has a USP/NF monograph, is a component of an FDA-approved drug, or is on the 503A bulks list; FDA tolerates interim 'Category 1' substances, flags 'Category 2' as significant safety risks, and treats 'Category 3' as lacking support.

FDA's category list was updated May 14, 2026. 503A Category 2 now contains only cesium chloride, domperidone, germanium sesquioxide, ibutamoren mesylate, kisspeptin-10 and quinacrine (intrauterine use). Category 1 includes glutathione, methylcobalamin, NAD, NADH, enclomiphene citrate, GHK-Cu (non-injectable routes only), vasoactive intestinal peptide and others. GHRP-2, GHRP-6, mechano growth factor and thymulin are in Category 3. BPC-157, TB-500, CJC-1295, ipamorelin, AOD-9604, Selank, Semax, epitalon, MOTs-C, dihexa, KPV and thymosin alpha-1 are in no category, so they do not get Category 1 enforcement discretion. FDA does not intend to categorize substances nominated on or after Jan 7, 2025. The final 503B bulks list is short (e.g., diphenylcyclopropenone, glycolic acid topical up to 70%, quinacrine oral, squaric acid dibutyl ester, trichloroacetic acid); 503B Category 2 includes GHRP-2, GHRP-6, ipamorelin acetate, ibutamoren, tranilast and others.

Biologics (including hCG, tesamorelin, somatropin) cannot be compounded under 503A/503BSince March 23, 2020, protein products approved as drugs became licensed biologics, and FDA says biological products are not eligible for the 503A or 503B compounding exemptions.

The BPCI Act transition on March 23, 2020 deemed approved NDAs for biological products to be BLAs. FDA's transition list includes chorionic gonadotropin (Pregnyl, Novarel, Fresenius chorionic gonadotropin, Ovidrel), menotropins, follitropins, hyaluronidase, somatropin and tesamorelin acetate (Egrifta/Egrifta SV). FDA's notice to compounders states that 'biological products will not be eligible for the exemptions for compounded drugs under sections 503A and 503B'. Separate FDA guidance (Jan 2018) describes limited conditions for mixing, diluting or repackaging licensed biologics outside their labeling.

'Research Use Only' / 'not for human consumption' productsFDA treats RUO-labeled peptides and GLP-1s as unapproved drugs when marketing, dosing information or bundled syringes/bacteriostatic water show human use; the disclaimer does not make them lawful to administer to patients.

FDA's GLP-1 safety page says companies sold products falsely labeled 'for research purposes' or 'not for human consumption' with dosing instructions for human use. FDA has issued repeated warning-letter rounds to peptide/RUO sellers in 2026 (e.g., letters dated March 31, 2026 to Gram Peptides and others; June 17, 2026 to Wholesale Peptide; August 24, 2026 to Royal Peptides and others). Import Alert 66-41 (unapproved new drugs promoted in the U.S.) has listed, for example, a firm offering PT-141 peptide. RUO material is not a USP-grade or approved-drug-component bulk ingredient for compounding and is not a prescription drug a clinician can lawfully buy for patient use.

FDA drug shortage list and why it matters for compoundingA drug in 'currently in shortage' status is not 'commercially available', so 503A/503B compounders may make copies of it; when FDA marks the shortage resolved, that permission ends (503B facilities may finish existing orders for up to 60 days).

The 503A copies guidance says a drug appears on the shortage list only if it is in 'currently in shortage' status, not 'resolved'. FDA's shortage-compounding page says compounders must still meet all other 503A conditions (including a valid patient-specific prescription), and FDA 'may take action if an outsourcing facility continues to fill new orders after the approved drug is removed from FDA's drug shortage list, or if it continues to fill existing orders more than 60 days after the drug has been removed.' The GLP-1 episode shows the effect: large-scale semaglutide and tirzepatide compounding depended on shortage status and ended after FDA resolved the shortages. A prescriber or compounder relying on a shortage should note on the prescription that the drug was on the list and the date checked.

FDA Standard MOU on interstate distribution of 503A compounded drugsThe October 2020 standard MOU is suspended after a 2021 court remand; FDA is not enforcing the statutory 5% out-of-state limit and plans a new rule, with a proposed rule projected for November 2026.

Section 503A limits a pharmacy in a state without an FDA MOU to distributing no more than 5% of its compounded prescriptions out of state. FDA published a final standard MOU in October 2020, but a federal court remanded it in September 2021. FDA 'considers the standard MOU published in October 2020 to be suspended' and, per its Oct 21, 2022 Federal Register notice, will not enforce the 5% limit until a final rule and updated MOU are published. The Fall 2025 Unified Agenda lists RIN 0910-AI71 ('Distribution of Compounded Drug Products Under Section 503A') at the proposed-rule stage with an NPRM projected for 11/2026. State nonresident-pharmacy licensing still applies (see state topics nonresident_pharmacy and fda_mou).

DEA telemedicine prescribing of controlled substances (Ryan Haight Act flexibilities)Through December 31, 2026, DEA-registered practitioners may prescribe Schedule II–V controlled substances by telemedicine without a prior in-person visit under a fourth temporary extension; the permanent special-registration rule is still pending.

The Ryan Haight Act generally requires an in-person medical evaluation before prescribing controlled substances over the internet. DEA and HHS published the Fourth Temporary Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities (90 FR 61301, Dec 31, 2025), effective Jan 1 – Dec 31, 2026. Prescriptions must still be for a legitimate medical purpose and comply with federal and state law; state telehealth and controlled-substance rules still apply (see telehealth_rx, state_csr, pdmp_mandate). The separate buprenorphine (opioid use disorder) telemedicine final rule and the VA continuity-of-care final rule, both published Jan 17, 2025, took effect Dec 31, 2025 after two delays (90 FR 13410). A Federal Register search on 2026-09-23 found no DEA special-registration final rule published in 2026. The Special Registrations for Telemedicine final rule was reported to be in OMB review as of late August 2026, with a final rule forecast for November 2026. Without a new rule or another extension, the in-person requirement returns on Jan 1, 2027.

FTC health-claim substantiation (advertising)The FTC requires competent and reliable scientific evidence, generally randomized controlled human trials, before a marketer makes health-benefit claims for any health product, including devices, tests, supplements and apps.

The FTC's Health Products Compliance Guidance (Dec 2022) replaced the 1998 supplement advertising guide. Marketers must have substantiation for every objective claim, express or implied, before it runs; for health benefits this generally means randomized, controlled human clinical testing. Qualifying disclosures must be clear and conspicuous, and advertisers are liable for misleading testimonials and endorsements. This sits alongside FDA's rules: FDA regulates labeling and intended use, and FDA warning letters in 2025–2026 target 'same as brand' and 'FDA-approved' claims for compounded drugs.

Current as of 2026-09-23

Adverse event reporting (MedWatch; 503B mandatory reporting)Clinicians and patients can report problems with drugs, biologics, devices and cosmetics to FDA's MedWatch voluntarily; 503B outsourcing facilities must report adverse events, while 503A pharmacies are not federally required to.

MedWatch accepts voluntary reports for prescription and OTC drugs, biologics (including human cell and tissue products), medical devices, combination products and cosmetics. Manufacturers, packers and distributors named on a marketed prescription drug label must file 15-day 'Alert reports' for serious and unexpected adverse experiences under 21 CFR 310.305; FDA's final guidance (Oct 2015) applies adverse event reporting to 503B outsourcing facilities. FDA notes that federal law does not require state-licensed 503A pharmacies to report adverse events, so compounded-drug events are likely under-reported. Under MoCRA, cosmetic 'responsible persons' must report serious adverse events within 15 business days.

Where FDA enforcement shows up: warning letters, import alerts, recallsFDA posts warning letters in a searchable database, detains risky imports through import alerts (e.g., 66-80 for GLP-1 APIs, 66-41 for unapproved drugs, 80-04 for gloves, 53-21 for adulterated cosmetics), and publishes recalls in its enforcement reports.

Import alerts let FDA detain products without physical examination. Import Alert 66-80 (GLP-1 receptor agonist bulk drug substances) detains semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide, exenatide, orforglipron, retatrutide and dulaglutide APIs unless the manufacturer is on FDA's 'Green List'; FDA cited that 21% of inspected GLP-1 API makers were noncompliant with CGMP. Import Alert 66-41 covers unapproved new drugs promoted in the U.S. and has listed firms offering unapproved botulinum toxin and PT-141 peptide. Recalls, including Class I recalls of compounded glutathione in July–August 2026, appear in FDA enforcement reports and openFDA.

Compounded peptides: where things stand in September 2026FDA pulled 12 peptides out of Category 2 in April 2026 after nominators withdrew them, and its advisory committee voted in July 2026 to recommend six for the 503A bulks list, but none is on the list or in Category 1 yet, so none has federal compounding permission today.

On April 15, 2026 FDA announced that 12 peptides (BPC-157, cathelicidin LL-37, dihexa acetate, emideltide/DSIP, epitalon, GHK-Cu injectable, KPV, PEG-MGF, melanotan II, MOTs-C, Semax, TB-500) would leave Category 2 after seven days because their nominations were withdrawn; FDA's list shows the change effective April 22, 2026. Law-firm analyses stress that leaving Category 2 does not place a substance on the 503A bulks list or in Category 1. At the July 23–24, 2026 PCAC meeting, members voted to recommend BPC-157 (8–6), KPV (8–6), TB-500 (8–6), MOTs-C (7–5), epitalon (7–4) and Semax (8–5), and against emideltide (6–7); FDA staff had recommended against all of them. FDA must still decide and complete notice-and-comment rulemaking. GHK-Cu, dihexa, LL-37, PEG-MGF and melanotan II are slated for a PCAC meeting before the end of February 2027. Earlier, AOD-9604, CJC-1295, ipamorelin, thymosin alpha-1 and Selank left Category 2 in September 2024, and PCAC voted against CJC-1295 and AOD-9604 on Dec 4, 2024.

Search the official databases

FDA

Drugs@FDAApproval status, application number, labels and approval letters for FDA-approved brand and generic drugs.Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence EvaluationsTherapeutic-equivalence (AB) ratings, reference listed drugs, patents and exclusivities for approved small-molecule drugs.Purple Book: Database of Licensed Biological ProductsLicensed biologics and their biosimilar and interchangeable products, with exclusivity dates.National Drug Code (NDC) DirectoryThe NDC, labeler, dosage form, marketing category and listing status of a drug product.FDA Drug ShortagesWhether a drug is on FDA's current shortage list, and its status, reason and expected resolution.Registered Outsourcing Facilities (503B)Whether a compounder is a registered 503B outsourcing facility, with its last FDA inspection and any Form 483 or warning letter.Bulk Drug Substances Used in Compounding Under Section 503A (Category 1/2/3 lists)Whether a bulk ingredient (for example a peptide) is in Category 1, 2 or 3 of FDA's interim 503A bulks policy, and links to the final 503A bulks list.503B Bulk Drug Substances ListBulk drug substances that outsourcing facilities may compound from because of clinical need, and substances FDA has placed on or excluded from the list.FDA Warning LettersSearchable warning letters to compounders, telehealth and med-spa sellers, device makers and others, by company, subject and date.FDA Import AlertsProducts and firms that FDA may detain at the border without examination, for example unapproved drugs, peptides and cosmetics.AccessGUDID (Global Unique Device Identification Database)Look up a medical device by UDI or device identifier to see its labeler, model, FDA product code, premarket number and MRI safety status.510(k) Premarket Notification DatabaseWhether a device (for example an aesthetic laser or energy device) was cleared through 510(k), with the K-number, product code and cleared indications.Premarket Approval (PMA) DatabaseClass III devices approved through PMA (for example dermal fillers), with approval orders, supplements and approved indications.MAUDE: Manufacturer and User Facility Device ExperienceReports of adverse events and malfunctions filed for a medical device, by brand, product code or manufacturer.MedWatch Online Voluntary Reporting Form (FDA 3500)Report a serious adverse event, product quality problem or medication error for a drug, biologic, device, compounded product or cosmetic.openFDAPublic APIs and downloads for FDA adverse-event, recall, labeling, NDC, 510(k)/PMA and UDI data.Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA)Federal cosmetics rules on facility registration, product listing, adverse-event reporting, safety substantiation and labeling, with their compliance dates.Cosmetics Direct (FDA cosmetic registration and listing portal)How cosmetic facilities register and products are listed under MoCRA through FDA's Cosmetics Direct portal.
Rules checked. Now buy from vendors who are.

Every vendor on MedGrid clears document review for its category before it lists. Join free with your NPI to see wholesale pricing.

Platform terms — non-circumvention

Non-circumvention. Every introduction made through MedGrid — doctor to vendor, doctor to pharmacy, vendor to pharmacy, partner to any of them — is platform-protected. For 24 months following an introduction, the parties agree not to solicit, contract, or transact directly (or through affiliates) in a manner that circumvents MedGrid or its fees. Renewals, refills, and reorders of platform-introduced relationships run through the platform. This clause is part of every participant agreement — doctor, vendor, pharmacy, and sales partner alike — and it protects the people who make the introductions as much as it protects MedGrid.

Educational summaries of public law and agency guidance, not legal advice. Researched 2026-09-23 from the sources linked on each answer; laws, board rules and FDA policy change, so confirm with the linked agency or your counsel before you rely on an answer. Found something out of date? Tell our compliance desk.