FDA and state rules, for what you actually buy.
Search a drug, ingredient or device for its live FDA record, or pick your state and a category to see the federal rules and what your state adds — each answer with its citation and source.


Wound care & dressings
FDA pathway: Device class I/II/unclassified | Drug | HCT/P 361 or Biologic (BLA)
Plain dressings are mostly Class I exempt devices; dressings with drugs, biologics or animal-derived materials need FDA clearance; amniotic/placental products qualify as 361 HCT/Ps only if minimally manipulated and used homologously.
On MedGrid as: Wound Care & Dressings · Wound Care & Hemostatics
The federal rules
Basic dressings are Class I, exemptHydrophilic (21 CFR 878.4018) and occlusive (878.4020) wound dressings are Class I and exempt from 510(k), but these classifications exclude dressings with added drugs, biologics or animal-derived materials.
Liquid bandages (880.5090) are also Class I.
- 21 CFR 878.4018 — Hydrophilic wound dressing — eCFR, 2026-09-01
- 21 CFR 878.4020 — Occlusive wound dressing — eCFR, 2026-09-01
Drug-containing and animal-derived dressings need 510(k)FDA product codes FRO (dressing, wound, drug) and KGN (wound dressing with animal-derived materials) are unclassified and reviewed through 510(k).
Check the product code and 510(k) number before buying.
- openFDA device classification: FRO, KGN, NAC, MGP — FDA (openFDA), 2026-09-23
Amniotic membrane and other tissue products (361 vs 351)An HCT/P is regulated only as a 361 tissue if it is minimally manipulated, for homologous use, not combined with other articles, and (generally) has no systemic effect; otherwise it needs a BLA or IND.
FDA's July 2020 guidance examples: amniotic membrane ground and lyophilized into particles is more than minimally manipulated; an amniotic membrane product used 'for wound healing and/or to reduce scarring and inflammation' is not homologous use; amniotic membrane covering the eye surface is homologous. Establishments must register and list HCT/Ps.
- 21 CFR 1271.10 — criteria for regulation solely under section 361 — eCFR, 2026-09-01
- Regulatory Considerations for HCT/Ps: Minimal Manipulation and Homologous Use (July 2020) — FDA (CBER/CDRH), 2020-07-01
Unapproved amniotic products marketed for injection draw FDA lettersFDA's March 12, 2024 untitled letter to Amnion Florida said injected amniotic membrane/fluid products marketed for conditions such as arthritis and tendinopathy are drugs and biological products.
See cellular-biologics category.
- Untitled Letter — Amnion Florida, LLC — FDA/CBER, 2024-03-12
Changing now
- FDA untitled/warning letters on amniotic and placental products continue; check CBER's list. — CBER Untitled Letters (BIMO/Team Biologics/Internet Surveillance/Other)
What West Virginia adds
Physicians dispensing from the officeWest Virginia physicians who dispense or administer controlled substances in the office must register with the Board of Medicine for each location, and a vendor summary reports a general dispensing registration and a 72-hour controlled-substance cap.Allowed with permit or limits
May physicians dispense prescription drugs (not just administer them) directly to patients from their practice? "Yes" means allowed under standard rules (labeling, records, and at most a simple notice to the board); "conditional" means a separate dispensing registration, permit or license, or quantity, day-supply or drug-category limits; "no" means prohibited except narrow exceptions.
The West Virginia Board of Medicine requires licensees (MDs, podiatrists, PAs) to register as a controlled substance dispensing practitioner at each office where they dispense or administer controlled substances, under W. Va. Code 60A-3-301 and 60A-3-302; the registration requires a DEA number and CSMP access and renews with the license (5 or 0 per location). A vendor summary also reports a Board of Medicine dispensing-physician registration (5 for two years), dispensing only to patients as part of an office visit, a posted notice of the right to use a pharmacy, and a 72-hour limit on dispensed controlled substances; those points were not confirmed in rule text.
Controlled-substance office registration confirmed from the Board of Medicine form (read in the state_csr research); the 72-hour cap and sign requirement come from a vendor summary. DOs are licensed by the separate Board of Osteopathic Medicine.
W. Va. Code 60A-3-301, 60A-3-302
- Controlled Substance Dispensing Practitioner Registration Application (July 2026) — West Virginia Board of Medicine, 2026-07-01
- W. Va. Code 60A-3-302 - Registration required — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- West Virginia Physician Dispensing Laws & Regulations — PharmaLink (vendor summary), 2026-09-23
State laws on stem cell / regenerative therapiesNo West Virginia law specific to stem cell, exosome or regenerative therapies was found, so FDA rules and general medical-practice rules apply.No state-specific law (FDA rules apply)
Has the state enacted a law or rule specifically about stem cell, exosome or regenerative-medicine therapies (notice/disclosure duties, permission for certain non-FDA-approved uses, or Right to Try extensions covering them)?
Compilations of state stem-cell laws from 2024 to 2026 list about a dozen states with specific laws (California, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington and Wyoming), plus Montana's general experimental-treatment law and Kansas's state stem cell center. West Virginia is not among them. Without a state-specific law, regenerative products are governed by federal FDA rules plus the state's general medical practice, advertising and consumer-protection laws, enforced by its medical board. Federal FDA rules still apply regardless of state law: stem cell, birth-tissue and exosome products are regulated by FDA, and a state law cannot make an unapproved biologic FDA-approved.
The finding of no law rests on multi-state compilations (a commercial one from Aug 2026 and a peer-reviewed one from Feb 2024, which is older than 2 years) and targeted searches, not a statute-by-statute review, and neither compilation is exhaustive. General Right to Try laws for terminal patients, where they exist, were not reviewed here.
None found
- State Stem Cell Laws: Accurate 2026 Map Update (lists 12 states with statutes; commercial source) — SaveMyFat, 2026-08-06
- U.S. State Laws on Medical Freedom and Investigational Stem Cell Procedures: A call to focus on state-based legislation (Cytotherapy) — Cytotherapy / PubMed Central, 2024-02-03
Compare every state: Physicians dispensing from the office · State laws on stem cell / regenerative therapies
West Virginia at a glance
Every topic we research, for West Virginia. Open any line for the rule, its citation and the source.
Pharmacy & compounding
Out-of-state pharmacies shipping into the stateAn out-of-state pharmacy must register with the West Virginia Board of Pharmacy (as a non-resident/mail-order pharmacy) and have a West Virginia-licensed pharmacist-in-charge before dispensing into West Virginia.License required
Must a pharmacy located in another state hold a license/registration from this state to ship prescriptions (including patient-specific 503A compounded preparations) to patients or practitioners here?
W. Va. Code §30-5-22 requires pharmacies to register with the Board, and §30-5-4 defines 'pharmacy' to include places outside the state that dispense drugs and provide pharmacist care to West Virginia residents. §30-5-24 separately requires mail-order pharmacies (more than 25% of prescriptions dispensed by mail or delivery, regardless of location) to hold a permit. Legislative rule 15 CSR 6 (effective July 1, 2026) states that a non-resident pharmacy must register 'in the same manner as a mail-order pharmacy' through a mail-order registration. The application must identify owners, the pharmacy manager and the PIC, and include the most current valid home-state inspection report and home-state licensure. Under 15 CSR 6 §8, the PIC or at least one designated pharmacist must hold a West Virginia pharmacist license and act as PIC of the registration. Other requirements include a toll-free counseling line on the label, a resident agent, and West Virginia CSMP reporting.
Under 15 CSR 1 §12 (eff. July 1, 2026), a pharmacy compounding sterile preparations needs a Sterile Pharmaceutical Compounding Permit on top of its pharmacy license, issued after a satisfactory inspection. That section does not say whether it applies to non-resident registrants, so confirm with the Board. The Board opened another round of amendments to 15 CSR 1, 3, 5, 8, 14 and 15 for comment (comments closed July 30, 2026); 15 CSR 6 was not on that list. The Board's application page was last updated in 2018 and may be stale. Board contact: 304-558-0558.
W. Va. Code §§30-5-4, 30-5-22, 30-5-24; W. Va. Code R. §§15-6-2, 15-6-3, 15-6-5, 15-6-7, 15-6-8 (15 CSR 6)
- 15 CSR 6 Mail-Order and Non-Resident Pharmacies (final filing, effective July 1, 2026) — West Virginia Secretary of State / Board of Pharmacy, 2026-07-01
- W. Va. Code §30-5-24 Permits for mail-order pharmacy — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- W. Va. Code §30-5-22 Pharmacies to be registered — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- W. Va. Code §30-5-4 Definitions — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- Non-Resident Mail Order Pharmacy (application page) — West Virginia Board of Pharmacy, 2018-08-17
Office-use compounding from 503A pharmaciesWest Virginia's pharmacy code and rules do not expressly address compounding for office use; only a general 5% cap on pharmacy-to-practitioner transfers exists, so check with the Board.Not confirmed
May a 503A (traditional) pharmacy dispense or distribute compounded preparations to a practitioner for office use (administration in the office, not patient-specific)? The federal position is that 503A requires patient-specific prescriptions; this is what the state pharmacy act and board rules allow.
W. Va. Code §30-5-4 and 15 CSR 1 §2.1.9 define compounding as preparation on a practitioner's prescription drug order or under the practitioner/patient/pharmacist relationship, including preparation in anticipation of orders based on regularly observed prescribing patterns. 'Manufacturing' includes preparing commercially available products from bulk compounds for resale by pharmacies or practitioners (15 CSR 1 §2.1.34). A separate general rule, 15 CSR 1 §6.1.1, lets a pharmacy transfer prescription drugs without a prescription to a permittee or practitioner if the transfer is recorded and total transfers stay at or below 5% of the pharmacy's prescription drug sales revenue in any 12 months. A pharmacy that exceeds 5% needs a wholesaler permit. No provision found expressly authorizes or prohibits 503A compounded preparations as office stock, or addresses nonresident pharmacies shipping office stock into the state. The Board of Pharmacy enforces these rules.
The law is silent specifically on compounded office use. A proposed amendment to 15 CSR 5 (wholesale/manufacturer; LRMRC-modified filing Aug. 26, 2026) would exclude from 'wholesale distribution' the sale of minimal quantities by retail pharmacies to practitioners for office use, within the same 5% cap; it is not yet final and does not mention compounded products. The 5% transfer rule does not override FDA's position that 503A compounding requires patient-specific prescriptions. Board contact: 304-558-0558, boardofpharmacy@wv.gov.
W. Va. Code §30-5-4 ('Compounding', 'Manufacturing'); W. Va. Code R. §§15-1-2.1.9, 15-1-2.1.34, 15-1-6.1.1 (15 CSR 1)
- 15 CSR 1 Licensure and Practice of Pharmacy (final filing, effective July 1, 2026) — West Virginia Secretary of State / Board of Pharmacy, 2026-07-01
- W. Va. Code §30-5-4 Definitions — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- WV Pharmacy Laws and Rules links — West Virginia Board of Pharmacy, 2026-07-27
503B outsourcing facilities shipping into the stateWest Virginia requires out-of-state drug manufacturers, a category the Board's definition extends to compounders, to hold a Board of Pharmacy Non-Resident Manufacturer license before shipping into the state; a 2026 proposed rule would name 503B outsourcing facilities explicitly.State license required
Does the state require an FDA-registered 503B outsourcing facility located outside the state to hold a state license/registration (as an outsourcing facility, nonresident manufacturer, wholesaler or pharmacy) before shipping into the state?
W. Va. Code §30-5-4 defines 'manufacturer' to cover persons manufacturing, preparing or packaging prescription drugs 'whether within or outside this state', and §30-5-25 requires a Board permit to manufacture, package or prepare drugs. The Board's Non-Resident Manufacturer page defines a manufacturer to include compounding. Board guidance states that an out-of-state manufacturer that distributes its product into West Virginia, directly or through a 3PL, must be licensed as a manufacturer. Wholesale distribution to anyone other than a patient also requires a Board license under the Wholesale Drug Distribution Licensing Act (W. Va. Code §60A-8-7). A pending amendment to 15 CSR 5 (LRMRC-modified filing Aug. 26, 2026) defines 'outsourcing facility' as a 503B-registered facility 'engaged in manufacturing by compounding'. It would treat outsourcing facilities as manufacturers for licensing and require an initial inspection satisfactory to the Board.
The Board has no separate 'outsourcing facility' license. The Non-Resident Manufacturer license (and a Controlled Substances handling permit if applicable) is the credential its materials point to, but confirm the exact category with the Board before shipping. The current 15 CSR 5 (eff. June 11, 2021) on the Secretary of State site is a scanned image and could not be text-searched for outsourcing provisions. The proposed 15 CSR 5 amendments go to the 2027 Legislature for authorization and are not yet in effect. The Board's application pages were last updated in 2018.
W. Va. Code §§30-5-4, 30-5-25, 60A-8-7; W. Va. Code R. 15 CSR 5 (current rule eff. June 11, 2021; proposed amendments §§15-5-2.8, 15-5-4.1, 15-5-5.1.8)
- Non-Resident Manufacturer (application page) — West Virginia Board of Pharmacy, 2018-08-23
- Manufacturer types guidance (Traditional/Virtual/Actual/3PL) — West Virginia Board of Pharmacy, 2026-09-23
- W. Va. Code §30-5-25 Permit for manufacture and packaging of drugs, medicines, distribution of prescription drugs — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- W. Va. Code §60A-8-7 Wholesale drug distributor licensing requirements — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- 15 CSR 5 Licensure of Wholesale Drug Distributors, Third Party Logistics Providers, and Manufacturers - proposed rule, modified filing — West Virginia Secretary of State / Board of Pharmacy, 2026-08-26
FDA compounding MOUWest Virginia has not signed FDA's standard compounding MOU, so under the statute its 503A pharmacies are limited to 5% out-of-state distribution, although FDA is not enforcing that limit while it rewrites the MOU.Not signed
Has the state signed FDA's standard Memorandum of Understanding Addressing Certain Distributions of Compounded Human Drug Products (October 2020)? If not, FD&C Act §503A limits its 503A pharmacies' out-of-state distribution to 5% of total prescription orders (currently not enforced by FDA pending rulemaking).
Signing the standard MOU means the state board agrees to investigate complaints about compounded drugs its 503A pharmacies ship out of state and to identify and report to FDA pharmacies that distribute "inordinate amounts" interstate (more than 50% of their compounded prescriptions); in exchange, the statutory 5% out-of-state cap in FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B) does not apply to that state's pharmacies. FDA lists only Colorado, Kentucky and New Hampshire as signatories; West Virginia is not among them. For a non-signing state, FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B)(ii) caps a 503A pharmacy's out-of-state distribution of compounded drugs at 5% of its total prescription orders. FDA now considers the October 2020 standard MOU suspended (it does not expect signatory states to carry out MOU activities and will not sign new ones) and is not enforcing the 5% limit until a final rule and an updated MOU are published; FDA's rulemaking (RIN 0910-AI71) listed a proposed rule for 11/2026 in the Fall 2025 Unified Agenda.
The FDA list of signed MOUs (current as of 2023-01-23) is older than 2 years, but FDA stopped entering new agreements under the 2020 MOU in October 2022, so no state can have signed since. The FDA "Compounding Information for States" page (current as of 2026-08-28) still describes the MOU as awaiting rulemaking. Pending: FDA proposed rule on 503A distribution (RIN 0910-AI71, NPRM projected 11/2026); H.R. 5316 (introduced 2025-09-11, referred to House Energy & Commerce) would remove the MOU provision from §503A.
FD&C Act §503A(b)(3)(B) (21 U.S.C. 353a(b)(3)(B))
- Compounding MOUs (list of signed standard MOUs) — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2023-01-23
- Memorandum of Understanding Addressing Certain Distributions of Compounded Drugs — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2022-10-20
- Compounding Information for States — U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2026-08-28
- Federal Register 87 FR 63770 (Oct. 21, 2022), Doc. 2022-22876 — MOU suspension and extension of 5% enforcement period — Federal Register / GovInfo, 2022-10-21
Prescribing, dispensing & telehealth
State controlled-substance registrationWest Virginia does not require a separate registration just to prescribe, but Board of Medicine licensees (MD, DPM, PA) must register as a controlled substance dispensing practitioner at each office where they administer or dispense controlled substances.Required in some settings
Besides DEA registration, does the state require practitioners to hold a separate state controlled substance registration, license or permit to prescribe, administer or dispense controlled substances (e.g. testosterone, Schedule III)? "Conditional" means a state registration is needed only in some settings, such as keeping controlled-substance stock in the office.
W. Va. Code 60A-3-302 requires annual registration for anyone who dispenses controlled substances, with a separate registration at each principal place of business, and 60A-3-301 assigns practitioner registration to the board that licenses the practitioner. The WV Board of Medicine's application (July 2026) says licensees must register as a controlled substance dispensing practitioner at each office location where they dispense or administer controlled substances in an office-based setting, but not for inpatient hospital practice or for writing prescriptions filled by a pharmacy. The registration requires a valid DEA number and CSMP access, renews with the license, and costs $15 or $30 per location depending on renewal year. The Board of Pharmacy separately issues an annual in-state controlled substance permit to persons who dispense unless exempted by its Rule 15-2-3.2 (exemptions not reviewed).
The Board of Medicine form covers MDs, podiatrists and PAs only; whether the Board of Osteopathic Medicine (DOs) and Board of Nursing (APRNs) impose an equivalent office-dispensing registration was not checked. Per the WV Board of Pharmacy FAQ, since 1/1/2023 APRNs and PAs may prescribe no Schedule I and at most a 3-day supply of a Schedule II narcotic. Board of Pharmacy permit page last updated 2018-09-07 (older than 2 years).
W. Va. Code 60A-3-301; 60A-3-302; 60A-3-303
- W. Va. Code 60A-3-302 - Registration required; effect of registration; exemptions; waiver; inspections — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- W. Va. Code 60A-3-301 - Rules; fees — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- Controlled Substance Dispensing Practitioner Registration Application (July 2026) — West Virginia Board of Medicine, 2026-07-01
- In-State Controlled Substance Permit — West Virginia Board of Pharmacy, 2018-09-07
- Controlled Substances FAQ — West Virginia Board of Pharmacy, 2024-04-09
PDMP check before prescribingWest Virginia requires a Controlled Substances Monitoring Program check when initially prescribing or dispensing any Schedule II drug, any opioid or any benzodiazepine and at least annually after that, so testosterone (Schedule III, non-opioid) is not covered.Required for some drugs only
Must a prescriber query the state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program before prescribing, and does the mandate cover Schedule III drugs such as testosterone? "Yes" means a mandate that reaches Schedule III; "conditional" means a mandate limited to certain drugs (e.g. opioids or benzodiazepines) or situations; "no" means no prescriber query mandate.
W. Va. Code Sec. 60A-9-5a(b) requires prescribers and dispensers licensed by the Boards of Medicine, Registered Professional Nurses, Dental Examiners, Osteopathic Medicine, Optometry and Pharmacy, upon initially prescribing or dispensing any Schedule II controlled substance, any opioid or any benzodiazepine to a patient who is not terminally ill, and at least annually thereafter while continuing to treat the patient with a controlled substance, to access the CSMP database and document it. Sec. 16-54-4(f) also requires accessing the database before an initial Schedule II opioid prescription and before extending Schedule II opioids beyond 30 days. All practitioners who prescribe or dispense Schedule II-V drugs must register with the CSMP (Sec. 60A-9-5a(a)); licensing boards enforce through their rules (Sec. 60A-9-5a(c)).
Sec. 60A-9-5a last amended 2021 (HB 2262). The Board of Medicine rule 11 CSR 10 is active in a version effective 6/1/2022, and the Secretary of State lists a newer version as 'In Progress' (text not opened) - check for changes. The statute's reference to 'pain-relieving controlled substance' is a leftover definition; the operative trigger is Schedule II, opioids and benzodiazepines.
W. Va. Code Sec. 60A-9-5a; Sec. 16-54-4; W. Va. Code R. 11-10 (Board of Medicine)
- W. Va. Code Sec. 60A-9-5a - Practitioner requirements to access database — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- W. Va. Code Sec. 16-54-4 - Opioid prescription limitations — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- Code of State Rules - Medicine 11-10, Practitioner Requirements for Accessing the WV CSMP Database (rule versions) — West Virginia Secretary of State, 2022-06-01
Physicians dispensing from the officeWest Virginia physicians who dispense or administer controlled substances in the office must register with the Board of Medicine for each location, and a vendor summary reports a general dispensing registration and a 72-hour controlled-substance cap.Allowed with permit or limits
May physicians dispense prescription drugs (not just administer them) directly to patients from their practice? "Yes" means allowed under standard rules (labeling, records, and at most a simple notice to the board); "conditional" means a separate dispensing registration, permit or license, or quantity, day-supply or drug-category limits; "no" means prohibited except narrow exceptions.
The West Virginia Board of Medicine requires licensees (MDs, podiatrists, PAs) to register as a controlled substance dispensing practitioner at each office where they dispense or administer controlled substances, under W. Va. Code 60A-3-301 and 60A-3-302; the registration requires a DEA number and CSMP access and renews with the license (5 or 0 per location). A vendor summary also reports a Board of Medicine dispensing-physician registration (5 for two years), dispensing only to patients as part of an office visit, a posted notice of the right to use a pharmacy, and a 72-hour limit on dispensed controlled substances; those points were not confirmed in rule text.
Controlled-substance office registration confirmed from the Board of Medicine form (read in the state_csr research); the 72-hour cap and sign requirement come from a vendor summary. DOs are licensed by the separate Board of Osteopathic Medicine.
W. Va. Code 60A-3-301, 60A-3-302
- Controlled Substance Dispensing Practitioner Registration Application (July 2026) — West Virginia Board of Medicine, 2026-07-01
- W. Va. Code 60A-3-302 - Registration required — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- West Virginia Physician Dispensing Laws & Regulations — PharmaLink (vendor summary), 2026-09-23
Prescribing by telehealthWest Virginia lets out-of-state physicians practice telehealth under an interstate telehealth registration instead of a full license; established telehealth patients must be seen in person within 12 months, and Schedule II (not Schedule III) is restricted.Allowed with extra conditions
For a patient located in the state: must the prescriber hold this state's license (or a telehealth registration or special license), is an in-person exam required before prescribing (generally or for controlled substances), are there state limits on prescribing Schedule III drugs such as testosterone by telehealth, and is the state an Interstate Medical Licensure Compact member? "Yes" means a state license and the in-person standard of care apply (opioid-only or Schedule II-only limits are described but do not change the answer); "conditional" means extra state conditions such as a telehealth registration route, an in-person exam requirement, controlled-substance limits reaching Schedule III, or registration of telehealth businesses. Federal DEA rules apply on top.
(1) A physician practicing telemedicine must hold a West Virginia license or an interstate telehealth registration with the Board, and a registrant may not practice from a physical location in West Virginia (W. Va. Code 30-3-13a(b), 30-1-26). (2) A relationship may be established by real-time video, interactive audio with store-and-forward, or real-time audio-only (video preferred), but not by email, text or questionnaire; the telehealth standard of care under 30-1-26 requires an established patient to see an in-person practitioner within 12 months of the initial telemedicine service or lose telemedicine access until an in-person visit (practitioner may suspend case by case; exceptions for acute inpatient, post-operative, behavioral, addiction and palliative care). (3) Physicians practicing solely by telemedicine may not prescribe Schedule II controlled substances, or Schedule II pain drugs for chronic nonmalignant pain, unless the patient is an established patient of the physician or group (other narrow exceptions); Schedule III drugs such as testosterone are not in that ban but fall under the 12-month in-person standard. (4) IMLC: member.
The code site's bill history for 30-3-13a lists 2026 Regular Session SB 677, but it is not listed among signed bills for the section (last signed change: 2024 SB 714). Board of Medicine interstate telehealth registration rule: 11 CSR 15 (per CCHP). The 12-month in-person standard is phrased in 30-1-26 as required content of board telehealth rules.
W. Va. Code 30-3-13a (2024 SB 714); W. Va. Code 30-1-26; 11 CSR 15
- W. Va. Code 30-3-13a - Telemedicine practice; requirements; exceptions; definitions; rule-making — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- W. Va. Code 30-1-26 - Telehealth practice; requirements; exceptions; definitions; rule-making — West Virginia Legislature, 2026-09-23
- CCHP - West Virginia telehealth policy (Professional Requirements), quoting 11 CSR 15-3 — Center for Connected Health Policy, 2026-05-09
- IMLC Commission - Compact State Map (participating states) — Interstate Medical Licensure Compact Commission, 2026-09-23
Aesthetics, IV therapy & practice ownership
Who may inject neuromodulators and fillersNo West Virginia rule or board statement on who may inject Botox or fillers was found.Not confirmed
Who may administer botulinum toxin and dermal fillers (physicians, PAs, NPs, RNs, LPNs, estheticians, dentists), under what supervision (on-site vs available), and must a physician/NP/PA perform a prior good-faith exam?
The West Virginia RN Board's law-and-scope page (checked 2026-09-23) lists general scope and delegation guidance (the 'Purple Book') but no cosmetic-injection statement, and the Board of Medicine's position statements cover corporate practice, APRN collaboration, lasers and retail IV therapy but not injectables.
- Laws, Rules and Scope of Practice — West Virginia Board of Registered Professional Nurses, 2026-09-23
- Position Statements — West Virginia Board of Medicine, 2026-09-23
IV hydration and vitamin therapyWest Virginia's medical, osteopathic and pharmacy boards (July 2026) say a physician, PA or APRN must personally evaluate and diagnose each retail IV patient (in person or by telehealth) and issue a prescription; standing orders should not be used, RNs may administer without a provider on site, and RNs may not mix cocktails.Extra requirements apply
What does the state require for elective IV hydration/vitamin (incl. NAD+) therapy: who may start IVs, is a patient-specific order or good-faith exam required before a patient's first IV, are standing orders allowed, and are there rules for mobile IV services?
The Joint Advisory Opinion Regarding Retail IV Therapy (listed as 07/27/2026) covers brick-and-mortar and mobile IV clinics and 'IV parties'. A provider-patient relationship must be established first; physicians, and PAs and APRNs within their scope, may assess patients, which requires personally evaluating, diagnosing and recommending treatment, in person or via telehealth with audio/video. IV saline and additives are prescription drugs; the order must be part of a plan including a personal examination, and physicians, PAs and APRNs should not issue standing orders for a retail IV business. RNs may insert IVs and monitor patients without a physician, PA or APRN on site, but may not compound; adding vitamins or drugs to saline is compounding governed by USP <797>, to be done by pharmacists or, in some cases, qualified practitioners who should personally compound what they order.
Date taken from the Board's position-statement listing. The WV RN Board is not a signatory, though the opinion addresses RN roles.
Joint Advisory Opinion Regarding Retail IV Therapy (WV Board of Medicine, Board of Osteopathic Medicine, Board of Pharmacy, 2026-07-27)
- Joint Advisory Opinion Regarding Retail IV Therapy — West Virginia Board of Medicine, Board of Osteopathic Medicine and Board of Pharmacy, 2026-07-27
- Position Statements (listing with date) — West Virginia Board of Medicine, 2026-09-23
Corporate practice of medicine / med spa ownershipCompilations rate West Virginia a strict corporate practice of medicine state, and the Board of Medicine has a 2018 position statement on the subject and registers medical corporations and PLLCs.Strong CPOM
Does the state enforce the corporate practice of medicine doctrine (non-physicians may not own medical practices or employ physicians), and how does that affect med spa ownership?
Permit Health's 2025 guide classifies West Virginia as strict, citing W.Va. Code §30-3-14 and a Board of Medicine position statement dated 2018-03-19; the Board's position-statement page lists 'Corporate Practice of Medicine 3/19/2018' (a scanned document that could not be read as text). The Board also runs business-entity registration for medical corporations and professional LLCs.
The 2018 position statement is a scanned image; its text was not read.
W.Va. Code §30-3-14 (as reported by Permit Health); WV Board of Medicine Position Statement 'Corporate Practice of Medicine' (2018-03-19)
- The Corporate Practice of Medicine 50-State Guide — Permit Health, 2025-12-23
- Position Statements (incl. Corporate Practice of Medicine 3/19/2018) — West Virginia Board of Medicine, 2018-03-19
Who may operate aesthetic lasersWest Virginia's Board of Medicine has a 2010 position statement on 'The Use of Lasers in Surgery', but it is a scanned document that could not be read, so its delegation terms are unconfirmed.Not confirmed
Who may perform laser/IPL/RF aesthetic procedures (laser hair removal, resurfacing): physicians only, delegated to RNs/PAs, or licensed electrologists/estheticians/laser technicians with state certification?
The Board of Medicine's position-statement page lists 'The Use of Lasers in Surgery' (2010-05-10). The file is an image-only PDF, so who may operate cosmetic lasers under it could not be verified. No West Virginia laser-technician licence was found.
Read the position statement directly (wvbom.wv.gov/download_resource.asp?id=11).
WV Board of Medicine Position Statement 'The Use of Lasers in Surgery' (2010-05-10) — content not verified
- Position Statements (incl. The Use of Lasers in Surgery 5/10/2010) — West Virginia Board of Medicine, 2010-05-10
Labs, regenerative medicine & cosmetics
State clinical laboratory licensing (beyond CLIA)Not confirmed. No West Virginia lab license beyond CLIA was found in the sources reviewed, but its absence was not verified.Not confirmed
Does the state license clinical laboratories itself, beyond federal CLIA certification, including out-of-state labs that test specimens from the state?
Most states rely on federal CLIA certification alone. The states confirmed in this research as issuing their own lab licenses are California, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Rhode Island (which also reach out-of-state labs testing specimens from their residents), plus Nevada, Washington, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New Hampshire (labs located in the state). West Virginia was not among them, but this research did not confirm its statutes. West Virginia's CLIA state agency is West Virginia Bureau for Public Health, Office of Laboratory Services (DHOLSCLIA@wv.gov, 304-205-8913); it can confirm whether any state license or permit applies, including to out-of-state labs.
West Virginia may run its own in-state lab licensing program; this could not be confirmed from a primary source in this pass, so check with the agency before relying on CLIA alone. ASCLS lists West Virginia among the states that license clinical laboratory personnel, which applies to labs located in the state.
Not confirmed
- CLIA State Agency Contacts (updated May 2026) — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2026-05-01
- Personnel Licensure (states with clinical laboratory personnel licensure) — American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science, 2026-09-23
Direct-to-consumer lab testingNot confirmed whether West Virginia consumers may order lab tests without a practitioner order. Practitioner-ordered panels are not affected.Not confirmed
May consumers order their own lab tests without a practitioner order (direct access testing)? A practitioner-ordered panel is always fine; this matters for take-home and consumer test kits.
ADLM (formerly AACC) reported in 2019 that 37 states and DC let consumers order some or all tests directly, but it did not publish the state list, and this research did not confirm West Virginia's rule. West Virginia's lab regulator (CLIA state agency) is West Virginia Bureau for Public Health, Office of Laboratory Services (DHOLSCLIA@wv.gov, 304-205-8913). The question matters for take-home and consumer test kits, not for panels a clinician orders.
The ADLM figure dates from 2019 (older than 2 years).
Not confirmed
- Direct-to-consumer laboratory testing (position statement, 2019): '37 states and the District of Columbia permit consumers to order some or all of their laboratory tests directly' — Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (formerly AACC), 2026-09-23
- CLIA State Agency Contacts (updated May 2026) — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2026-05-01
State laws on stem cell / regenerative therapiesNo West Virginia law specific to stem cell, exosome or regenerative therapies was found, so FDA rules and general medical-practice rules apply.No state-specific law (FDA rules apply)
Has the state enacted a law or rule specifically about stem cell, exosome or regenerative-medicine therapies (notice/disclosure duties, permission for certain non-FDA-approved uses, or Right to Try extensions covering them)?
Compilations of state stem-cell laws from 2024 to 2026 list about a dozen states with specific laws (California, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington and Wyoming), plus Montana's general experimental-treatment law and Kansas's state stem cell center. West Virginia is not among them. Without a state-specific law, regenerative products are governed by federal FDA rules plus the state's general medical practice, advertising and consumer-protection laws, enforced by its medical board. Federal FDA rules still apply regardless of state law: stem cell, birth-tissue and exosome products are regulated by FDA, and a state law cannot make an unapproved biologic FDA-approved.
The finding of no law rests on multi-state compilations (a commercial one from Aug 2026 and a peer-reviewed one from Feb 2024, which is older than 2 years) and targeted searches, not a statute-by-statute review, and neither compilation is exhaustive. General Right to Try laws for terminal patients, where they exist, were not reviewed here.
None found
- State Stem Cell Laws: Accurate 2026 Map Update (lists 12 states with statutes; commercial source) — SaveMyFat, 2026-08-06
- U.S. State Laws on Medical Freedom and Investigational Stem Cell Procedures: A call to focus on state-based legislation (Cytotherapy) — Cytotherapy / PubMed Central, 2024-02-03
State rules for cosmetics and sunscreenNo West Virginia-specific cosmetic or sunscreen requirements beyond federal law (MoCRA/FDA) were found.None found beyond federal
Does the state have cosmetic or sunscreen requirements beyond federal MoCRA, such as ingredient bans (PFAS, formaldehyde, phthalates), ingredient reporting, sunscreen-ingredient bans, or bans on selling animal-tested cosmetics?
West Virginia does not appear on 2026 compilations of state PFAS-in-cosmetics laws, on the list of states banning animal-tested cosmetics, or among the jurisdictions with sunscreen-ingredient bans. Federal MoCRA and FDA rules on cosmetics and OTC sunscreens still apply. Other state laws that touch cosmetics generally, such as state food-drug-cosmetic acts or consumer-protection laws, were not surveyed.
The animal-testing list is Wikipedia's 'as of 2023' compilation (older than 2 years); effective dates were not confirmed.
None found
- PFAS in Cosmetics: US State Bans and Compliance Deadlines - 2026 Update — Adherent (formerly Compliance & Risks), 2026-03-13
- State PFAS Bans in Cosmetics Expand Ahead of 2026 (updated Jan. 14, 2026) — Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, 2026-01-14
- Testing cosmetics on animals (US state bans 'as of 2023') — Wikipedia, 2026-09-23
Compare every state
State rules for cosmetics and sunscreen. Does the state have cosmetic or sunscreen requirements beyond federal MoCRA, such as ingredient bans (PFAS, formaldehyde, phthalates), ingredient reporting, sunscreen-ingredient bans, or bans on selling animal-tested cosmetics?
The federal floor, for every category
Two federal compounding lanes: §503A pharmacies vs §503B outsourcing facilitiesA §503A pharmacy (or physician) compounds for an identified patient on a prescription; a §503B outsourcing facility is FDA-registered, follows CGMP, and is the only federal lane for non-patient-specific office stock.
Under §503A, a state-licensed pharmacist or physician may compound for an identified individual patient on a valid prescription, or in limited anticipatory quantities (no more than a 30-day supply based on the compounder's own prescription history). 503A compounders are not required to follow CGMP and are not required to report adverse events to FDA. Under §503B, an outsourcing facility registers with FDA, compounds under CGMP, is inspected on a risk-based schedule, must report adverse events, and may distribute non-patient-specific product to hospitals, clinics and practitioners for office use. Neither lane makes a compounded drug 'FDA-approved'. Both lanes restrict 'essentially copies' of approved or marketed drugs and restrict which bulk ingredients may be used. FDA keeps a public list of registered outsourcing facilities (content current as of 09/08/2026).
- Prescription Requirement Under Section 503A of the FD&C Act — Guidance for Industry — FDA/CDER, 2016-12-01
- Registered Outsourcing Facilities — FDA, 2026-09-08
- FDA's Concerns with Unapproved GLP-1 Drugs Used for Weight Loss (503A adverse events not required to be reported) — FDA, 2026-09-01
'Essentially a copy' of an approved or commercially available drugFDA treats a compounded drug with the same active ingredient, a similar strength and a usable route as a marketed product as 'essentially a copy' unless the prescriber documents a patient-specific significant difference on the prescription.
503A (final guidance, Jan 2018): a drug is not 'commercially available' if it is discontinued or is in 'currently in shortage' status on FDA's drug shortage list. FDA generally considers a compounded drug a copy if it has the same API in the same, similar or easily substitutable strength by a route the commercial product can be used by. The prescriber's determination must name the change and the significant difference for that patient; a patient name plus formulation is not enough, and lower price does not count. FDA does not consider copies to be made 'regularly or in inordinate amounts' if the compounder fills four or fewer such prescriptions per calendar month. 503B (final guidance, Jan 2018): outsourcing facilities may not compound drugs identical or nearly identical to an approved drug unless it is on the shortage list; otherwise a prescriber's determination of a clinical difference must be noted on the prescription or order.
- Compounded Drug Products That Are Essentially Copies of a Commercially Available Drug Product Under Section 503A — Guidance for Industry — FDA/CDER, 2018-01-01
- Compounded Drug Products That Are Essentially Copies of Approved Drug Products Under Section 503B — Guidance for Industry — FDA/CDER, 2018-01-01
Office use / office stock of compounded drugs (federal position)FDA's position is that §503A compounding requires a prescription for an identified patient; clinics wanting non-patient-specific office stock are directed to §503B outsourcing facilities.
FDA's final 503A prescription-requirement guidance (Dec 2016) says hospitals, clinics and practitioners can obtain non-patient-specific compounded drugs from outsourcing facilities registered under §503B, which may distribute sterile and non-sterile office-use product. 503A anticipatory compounding is limited to no more than a 30-day supply based on the compounder's own prescription history. Some states allow limited 503A office use under state law, but the federal 503A exemptions still depend on patient-specific prescriptions (see state topic office_use_503a).
503B products may not be resold by anyone other than the outsourcing facilitySection 503B(a)(8) bars anyone other than the outsourcing facility from selling or transferring its compounded drugs, so a clinic, distributor or marketplace that takes ownership may not resell 503B product.
FDA's June 2023 draft guidance (still draft) says the drug should go from the outsourcing facility to the entity that dispenses or administers it. FDA does not intend to apply the prohibition to transfers to common carriers, third-party logistics providers, regulators, returns processors, waste handlers or contract test labs, or to recall-related transfers. A state-licensed pharmacy may dispense 503B product against a patient-specific prescription. Clinic-to-clinic resale is the core concern.
- Prohibition on Wholesaling Under Section 503B of the FD&C Act — Draft Guidance for Industry — FDA/CDER, 2023-06-27
Which bulk ingredients compounders may use (503A Categories 1/2/3; 503B bulks list)A 503A compounder may use a bulk ingredient only if it has a USP/NF monograph, is a component of an FDA-approved drug, or is on the 503A bulks list; FDA tolerates interim 'Category 1' substances, flags 'Category 2' as significant safety risks, and treats 'Category 3' as lacking support.
FDA's category list was updated May 14, 2026. 503A Category 2 now contains only cesium chloride, domperidone, germanium sesquioxide, ibutamoren mesylate, kisspeptin-10 and quinacrine (intrauterine use). Category 1 includes glutathione, methylcobalamin, NAD, NADH, enclomiphene citrate, GHK-Cu (non-injectable routes only), vasoactive intestinal peptide and others. GHRP-2, GHRP-6, mechano growth factor and thymulin are in Category 3. BPC-157, TB-500, CJC-1295, ipamorelin, AOD-9604, Selank, Semax, epitalon, MOTs-C, dihexa, KPV and thymosin alpha-1 are in no category, so they do not get Category 1 enforcement discretion. FDA does not intend to categorize substances nominated on or after Jan 7, 2025. The final 503B bulks list is short (e.g., diphenylcyclopropenone, glycolic acid topical up to 70%, quinacrine oral, squaric acid dibutyl ester, trichloroacetic acid); 503B Category 2 includes GHRP-2, GHRP-6, ipamorelin acetate, ibutamoren, tranilast and others.
- Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503A (Categories 1–3) — FDA, 2026-05-14
- Bulk Drug Substances Used in Compounding Under Section 503A of the FD&C Act — FDA, 2026-05-14
- Safety Risks Associated with Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding (Category 2) — FDA, 2026-04-22
- 503B Bulk Drug Substances List — FDA, 2024-05-16
- Bulk Drug Substances Used in Compounding Under Section 503B of the FD&C Act — FDA, 2025-01-07
Biologics (including hCG, tesamorelin, somatropin) cannot be compounded under 503A/503BSince March 23, 2020, protein products approved as drugs became licensed biologics, and FDA says biological products are not eligible for the 503A or 503B compounding exemptions.
The BPCI Act transition on March 23, 2020 deemed approved NDAs for biological products to be BLAs. FDA's transition list includes chorionic gonadotropin (Pregnyl, Novarel, Fresenius chorionic gonadotropin, Ovidrel), menotropins, follitropins, hyaluronidase, somatropin and tesamorelin acetate (Egrifta/Egrifta SV). FDA's notice to compounders states that 'biological products will not be eligible for the exemptions for compounded drugs under sections 503A and 503B'. Separate FDA guidance (Jan 2018) describes limited conditions for mixing, diluting or repackaging licensed biologics outside their labeling.
'Research Use Only' / 'not for human consumption' productsFDA treats RUO-labeled peptides and GLP-1s as unapproved drugs when marketing, dosing information or bundled syringes/bacteriostatic water show human use; the disclaimer does not make them lawful to administer to patients.
FDA's GLP-1 safety page says companies sold products falsely labeled 'for research purposes' or 'not for human consumption' with dosing instructions for human use. FDA has issued repeated warning-letter rounds to peptide/RUO sellers in 2026 (e.g., letters dated March 31, 2026 to Gram Peptides and others; June 17, 2026 to Wholesale Peptide; August 24, 2026 to Royal Peptides and others). Import Alert 66-41 (unapproved new drugs promoted in the U.S.) has listed, for example, a firm offering PT-141 peptide. RUO material is not a USP-grade or approved-drug-component bulk ingredient for compounding and is not a prescription drug a clinician can lawfully buy for patient use.
- FDA's Concerns with Unapproved GLP-1 Drugs Used for Weight Loss — FDA, 2026-09-01
- Warning Letter: Gram Peptides (MARCS-CMS 721806) — FDA, 2026-03-31
- Warning Letter: Wholesale Peptide (MARCS-CMS 729447) — FDA, 2026-06-17
- Warning Letter: Royal Peptides LLC (MARCS-CMS 734884) — FDA, 2026-08-24
- Import Alert 66-41: Detention Without Physical Examination of Unapproved New Drugs Promoted in the U.S. — FDA, 2026-09-11
FDA drug shortage list and why it matters for compoundingA drug in 'currently in shortage' status is not 'commercially available', so 503A/503B compounders may make copies of it; when FDA marks the shortage resolved, that permission ends (503B facilities may finish existing orders for up to 60 days).
The 503A copies guidance says a drug appears on the shortage list only if it is in 'currently in shortage' status, not 'resolved'. FDA's shortage-compounding page says compounders must still meet all other 503A conditions (including a valid patient-specific prescription), and FDA 'may take action if an outsourcing facility continues to fill new orders after the approved drug is removed from FDA's drug shortage list, or if it continues to fill existing orders more than 60 days after the drug has been removed.' The GLP-1 episode shows the effect: large-scale semaglutide and tirzepatide compounding depended on shortage status and ended after FDA resolved the shortages. A prescriber or compounder relying on a shortage should note on the prescription that the drug was on the list and the date checked.
FDA Standard MOU on interstate distribution of 503A compounded drugsThe October 2020 standard MOU is suspended after a 2021 court remand; FDA is not enforcing the statutory 5% out-of-state limit and plans a new rule, with a proposed rule projected for November 2026.
Section 503A limits a pharmacy in a state without an FDA MOU to distributing no more than 5% of its compounded prescriptions out of state. FDA published a final standard MOU in October 2020, but a federal court remanded it in September 2021. FDA 'considers the standard MOU published in October 2020 to be suspended' and, per its Oct 21, 2022 Federal Register notice, will not enforce the 5% limit until a final rule and updated MOU are published. The Fall 2025 Unified Agenda lists RIN 0910-AI71 ('Distribution of Compounded Drug Products Under Section 503A') at the proposed-rule stage with an NPRM projected for 11/2026. State nonresident-pharmacy licensing still applies (see state topics nonresident_pharmacy and fda_mou).
- Memorandum of Understanding Addressing Certain Distributions of Compounded Drugs — FDA, 2022-10-20
- Extension of the Period Before FDA Intends To Begin Enforcing the Statutory 5 Percent Limit on Out-of-State Distribution of Compounded Human Drug Products (87 FR, Oct 21, 2022) — Federal Register, 2022-10-21
- Unified Agenda, RIN 0910-AI71: Distribution of Compounded Drug Products Under Section 503A (Fall 2025) — OMB/OIRA, 2025-10-01
DEA telemedicine prescribing of controlled substances (Ryan Haight Act flexibilities)Through December 31, 2026, DEA-registered practitioners may prescribe Schedule II–V controlled substances by telemedicine without a prior in-person visit under a fourth temporary extension; the permanent special-registration rule is still pending.
The Ryan Haight Act generally requires an in-person medical evaluation before prescribing controlled substances over the internet. DEA and HHS published the Fourth Temporary Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities (90 FR 61301, Dec 31, 2025), effective Jan 1 – Dec 31, 2026. Prescriptions must still be for a legitimate medical purpose and comply with federal and state law; state telehealth and controlled-substance rules still apply (see telehealth_rx, state_csr, pdmp_mandate). The separate buprenorphine (opioid use disorder) telemedicine final rule and the VA continuity-of-care final rule, both published Jan 17, 2025, took effect Dec 31, 2025 after two delays (90 FR 13410). A Federal Register search on 2026-09-23 found no DEA special-registration final rule published in 2026. The Special Registrations for Telemedicine final rule was reported to be in OMB review as of late August 2026, with a final rule forecast for November 2026. Without a new rule or another extension, the in-person requirement returns on Jan 1, 2027.
- Fourth Temporary Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities for Prescription of Controlled Medications, 90 FR 61301 (Federal Register API record: effective Jan 1 – Dec 31, 2026) — DEA/HHS, Federal Register, 2025-12-31
- Fourth Temporary Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities for Prescription of Controlled Medications (FR Doc. 2025-24123) — DEA/HHS, Federal Register, 2025-12-31
- Expansion of Buprenorphine Treatment via Telemedicine Encounter and Continuity of Care via Telemedicine for VA Patients — effective Dec 31, 2025, 90 FR 13410 (API record) — DEA/HHS, Federal Register, 2025-03-24
- DEA and HHS Extend Telemedicine Prescribing Flexibilities Through 2026 — Holland & Knight, 2026-01-13
- DEA Prescribing of Controlled Substances (tracker) — Alliance for Connected Care, 2026-08-26
- Expansion of Buprenorphine Treatment via Telemedicine Encounter and Continuity of Care via Telemedicine for VA Patients — delay of effective date (FR Doc. 2025-05007) — DEA/HHS, Federal Register, 2025-03-24
FTC health-claim substantiation (advertising)The FTC requires competent and reliable scientific evidence, generally randomized controlled human trials, before a marketer makes health-benefit claims for any health product, including devices, tests, supplements and apps.
The FTC's Health Products Compliance Guidance (Dec 2022) replaced the 1998 supplement advertising guide. Marketers must have substantiation for every objective claim, express or implied, before it runs; for health benefits this generally means randomized, controlled human clinical testing. Qualifying disclosures must be clear and conspicuous, and advertisers are liable for misleading testimonials and endorsements. This sits alongside FDA's rules: FDA regulates labeling and intended use, and FDA warning letters in 2025–2026 target 'same as brand' and 'FDA-approved' claims for compounded drugs.
- Health Products Compliance Guidance — Federal Trade Commission, 2022-12-01
- FDA to Telehealth Companies: What to Know When Promoting Compounded Drugs — FDA, 2026-06-15
Adverse event reporting (MedWatch; 503B mandatory reporting)Clinicians and patients can report problems with drugs, biologics, devices and cosmetics to FDA's MedWatch voluntarily; 503B outsourcing facilities must report adverse events, while 503A pharmacies are not federally required to.
MedWatch accepts voluntary reports for prescription and OTC drugs, biologics (including human cell and tissue products), medical devices, combination products and cosmetics. Manufacturers, packers and distributors named on a marketed prescription drug label must file 15-day 'Alert reports' for serious and unexpected adverse experiences under 21 CFR 310.305; FDA's final guidance (Oct 2015) applies adverse event reporting to 503B outsourcing facilities. FDA notes that federal law does not require state-licensed 503A pharmacies to report adverse events, so compounded-drug events are likely under-reported. Under MoCRA, cosmetic 'responsible persons' must report serious adverse events within 15 business days.
- MedWatch: The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program — FDA, 2026-09-21
- Adverse Event Reporting for Outsourcing Facilities Under Section 503B — Guidance for Industry — FDA/CDER, 2015-10-01
- 21 CFR 310.305 — Records and reports concerning adverse drug experiences on marketed prescription drugs — eCFR, 2026-09-01
- Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA) — FDA, 2026-08-10
Where FDA enforcement shows up: warning letters, import alerts, recallsFDA posts warning letters in a searchable database, detains risky imports through import alerts (e.g., 66-80 for GLP-1 APIs, 66-41 for unapproved drugs, 80-04 for gloves, 53-21 for adulterated cosmetics), and publishes recalls in its enforcement reports.
Import alerts let FDA detain products without physical examination. Import Alert 66-80 (GLP-1 receptor agonist bulk drug substances) detains semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide, exenatide, orforglipron, retatrutide and dulaglutide APIs unless the manufacturer is on FDA's 'Green List'; FDA cited that 21% of inspected GLP-1 API makers were noncompliant with CGMP. Import Alert 66-41 covers unapproved new drugs promoted in the U.S. and has listed firms offering unapproved botulinum toxin and PT-141 peptide. Recalls, including Class I recalls of compounded glutathione in July–August 2026, appear in FDA enforcement reports and openFDA.
- FDA Warning Letters (searchable database) — FDA, 2026-09-23
- Import Alert 66-80: GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Bulk Drug Substances (Green List) — FDA, 2026-09-21
- Import Alert 66-41: Unapproved New Drugs Promoted in the U.S. — FDA, 2026-09-11
- openFDA drug enforcement (recall) query: sterile water / glutathione recalls 2023–2026 — FDA (openFDA), 2026-09-16
Compounded peptides: where things stand in September 2026FDA pulled 12 peptides out of Category 2 in April 2026 after nominators withdrew them, and its advisory committee voted in July 2026 to recommend six for the 503A bulks list, but none is on the list or in Category 1 yet, so none has federal compounding permission today.
On April 15, 2026 FDA announced that 12 peptides (BPC-157, cathelicidin LL-37, dihexa acetate, emideltide/DSIP, epitalon, GHK-Cu injectable, KPV, PEG-MGF, melanotan II, MOTs-C, Semax, TB-500) would leave Category 2 after seven days because their nominations were withdrawn; FDA's list shows the change effective April 22, 2026. Law-firm analyses stress that leaving Category 2 does not place a substance on the 503A bulks list or in Category 1. At the July 23–24, 2026 PCAC meeting, members voted to recommend BPC-157 (8–6), KPV (8–6), TB-500 (8–6), MOTs-C (7–5), epitalon (7–4) and Semax (8–5), and against emideltide (6–7); FDA staff had recommended against all of them. FDA must still decide and complete notice-and-comment rulemaking. GHK-Cu, dihexa, LL-37, PEG-MGF and melanotan II are slated for a PCAC meeting before the end of February 2027. Earlier, AOD-9604, CJC-1295, ipamorelin, thymosin alpha-1 and Selank left Category 2 in September 2024, and PCAC voted against CJC-1295 and AOD-9604 on Dec 4, 2024.
- Safety Risks Associated with Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding (Category 2; withdrawn list) — FDA, 2026-04-22
- July 23-24, 2026: Meeting of the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee — FDA, 2026-08-06
- Bulk-list bound? PCAC backs majority of peptides in two-day public meeting — McDermott (law firm), 2026-07-27
- FDA Announces Removal of 12 Peptides from Category 2 and Schedules PCAC Meetings — Orrick, 2026-04-16
- FDA to Remove 12 Popular Peptides from the Category 2 'Do Not Compound' List — Frier Levitt, 2026-09-23
- Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Use in Compounding Under Section 503A (Categories 1–3) — FDA, 2026-05-14
- Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting (July 23–24, 2026; 503A bulks nominations), 91 FR 20465 — FDA, Federal Register, 2026-04-16
Search the official databases
FDA
DEA
Registries & compacts
Every vendor on MedGrid clears document review for its category before it lists. Join free with your NPI to see wholesale pricing.
Platform terms — non-circumvention
Non-circumvention. Every introduction made through MedGrid — doctor to vendor, doctor to pharmacy, vendor to pharmacy, partner to any of them — is platform-protected. For 24 months following an introduction, the parties agree not to solicit, contract, or transact directly (or through affiliates) in a manner that circumvents MedGrid or its fees. Renewals, refills, and reorders of platform-introduced relationships run through the platform. This clause is part of every participant agreement — doctor, vendor, pharmacy, and sales partner alike — and it protects the people who make the introductions as much as it protects MedGrid.
Educational summaries of public law and agency guidance, not legal advice. Researched 2026-09-23 from the sources linked on each answer; laws, board rules and FDA policy change, so confirm with the linked agency or your counsel before you rely on an answer. Found something out of date? Tell our compliance desk.
